• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* New Zealand in India 2010

Hurricane

Hall of Fame Member
Hmm we were handi-capped by injuries (well...Ryder and McCullum had the highest scores) but Taylor and Vettori are better than they have shown on this tour.

Moral of the story is we have three good batsmen, two developing batsmen, an inconsistent just test class batsman, and two passengers in the top eight. If two guys get injured and another two are out of form, we're in a bit of strife.

So I guess you are right to an extent, but I will be disappointed, if we do lose, that 1-0 to India is held as satisfactory. Just because something is better than expected it doesn't mean it's satisfactory.

But we have found some possible answers to several questions about our batting in this series, which is good. Martin and Southee performing decently on flat pitches is good too. Bodes well for when we host your lads. Should be a good series and hopefully it will be controversy free.
Who is the second developing batsman> Kane and who?
 

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
Like the look of McKay. Yes this track has more pace and carry so he's obviously going to look better than Bennett, Southee and Martin who bowled on flat tracks, but he's generating some nice pace and putting it in good areas. Hurrying the batsman at times.
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Really liking the looks of Andy McKay. Also the added bonus of having the finest bald patch in world cricket.
 

Top