Yeah anything in England before 1960 was definitely uncovered; anything after 1985 was definitely covered. Anything in between is anyone's guess.It was a gradual process - parts of the pitch left uncovered - but they were fully covered by the mid-eighties.
I'd love there still to be a mixture. Especially if the home side got to decide on whether to cover them or not.Yeah anything in England before 1960 was definitely uncovered; anything after 1985 was definitely covered. Anything in between is anyone's guess.
Worth trying to find out though - it'd be quite a thing for Swann to have the first 10WM on a covered pitch in Leeds. Fredfertang could probably find out for us, if he doesn't already know.
Not since Derek Underwood bowled England to victory against Australia in 1972 on a pitch that was not much better than rolled mud has an England spinner had such an influence on a Headingley Test as Graeme Swann has against New Zealand.
Even Underwood's return of 10 for 82 owed much to chicanery. Wisden recorded that the square was flooded by a "freak thunderstorm" a few days before the match and suggested that the pitch was not up to Test quality.
TV shows take a while to get to the colonies.That's a dated reference by now Cribb, I'm disappointed in you.
Yeah. He literally said "I'm not bothered" as the first part of his answer.What did he say? I take it from Cribb's post he said he doesn't mind where he bats, he's just happy to be here, put it in the right areas etc
Draw your own conclusions.the most boring interview ever known to man