thierry henry
International Coach
10 overs and counting. Gotta be getting up there.
ok boomerIs this satire? I'm gen x. I really miss the great analysis of the past be it in sport, politics, culture whatever.
I used to think Paul Holmes was a bit average but compared to excrement like Seven Sharp and The Project he appeared a genius.
Watch old political debates between Muldoon and Lange then compare that to Jacinda and Simon. I really miss informed analysis. Our media used to apply critical thinking and in depth analysis. Now Stuff and the NZ Herald produce garbage and don't even proofread.
are we talking a regular cricket ball here or the heavy ball (tm)?Yeah but to get the ball to a certain length from a certain height at a certain speed surely requires a specific downward force. Hashtag mysteries of cricket.
As are you :-)im trolling a tad but youre also a person who posts on internet forums i.e. the 0.1% of cricket fans
I was expecting that.ok boomer
Classic know-it-all boomer responseI was expecting that.
This also plays back into my earlier comments regarding Matt Henry - I swear the best times I've seen him bowl, when he's in the best rhythm, he seems to release the ball right at the top of his delivery stride and that gives him a bit more zip. Other times he... doesn't, seems to almost squat through the crease, not making the most of his height.The answer is that Cummins probably has a higher release than Starc. Starc bends over a lot and has a very low release for his height. They had some measurement during the Brisbane test against SL last year and Starc's release was only 6cm higher than 5'10" Richardson's.
True. My wife wonders why I go on CW but I think she figures there's a lot of worse stuff online.im trolling a tad but youre also a person who posts on internet forums i.e. the 0.1% of cricket fans
would be interested to see their actual release points. Starc gets way lower at release so I wouldn't be surprised is cummins has a higher actual release point.It’s weird how Cummins is shorter and slower and yet when Starc hits the same length as Cummins he seems to be less ‘into the deck’. Cricket defies physics.
We're barely below Stormfront.True. My wife wonders why I go on CW but I think she figures there's a lot of worse stuff online.
Yep, I’ve never really considered Starc ‘slingy’ but he has a really long delivery stride which drops his heightwould be interested to see their actual release points. Starc gets way lower at release so I wouldn't be surprised is cummins has a higher actual release point.
Where did I say that, though?So we aren't allowed to debut guys? Gary Stead is that you?
when I (not so) briefly went down the biomechanics rabbithole in an effort to become NZs answer to Mitch Johnson it seemed well understood that trying to optimise an action for pace is not always the same as optimising for bounce. Starc's action is not unlike Lee's - near perfect for producing consistent pace but in exploiting all the lower body stretch reflex you lose a bit of release height.Yep, I’ve never really considered Starc ‘slingy’ but he has a really long delivery stride which drops his height