It's a wider line in tests I think.How is that not a wide? It was outside the return crease.
Outside the return cream is out of reach batsmen who don't have ape-proportion-length arms. Usually such balls will be called wide in any format.It's a wider line in tests I think.
I banged on about this heaps during the Ashes but it's pretty obvious that umpires are not following the actual rule when it comes to wides in Tests, i.e. "too far away to play a reasonable cricket shot". Now it just seems like "it has to be really really really bad to be a wide".Outside the return cream is out of reach batsmen who don't have ape-proportion-length arms. Usually such balls will be called wide in any format.
I can only think of the number of deliveries the Archer would have had to re-bowl had the law been interpreted properly. He had them sailing most of the time.I banged on about this heaps during the Ashes but it's pretty obvious that umpires are not following the actual rule when it comes to wides in Tests, i.e. "too far away to play a reasonable cricket shot". Now it just seems like "it has to be really really really bad to be a wide".
Starc would average 30+ if wides were called properlyI banged on about this heaps during the Ashes but it's pretty obvious that umpires are not following the actual rule when it comes to wides in Tests, i.e. "too far away to play a reasonable cricket shot". Now it just seems like "it has to be really really really bad to be a wide".
For Bangladesh that's usually about 94.You know an innings is going poorly for the bowling side when the overs exceeds the speed gun.