Not to mention invisible ****s like me.There are currently 69 users browsing this thread. (35 members and 34 guests)
Spikey, Adders, Chewie, Daemon, FaaipDeOiad, Flametree, Gnske, Gob, GotSpin, James, jcas0167, Justo, KingChowder, marc71178, Meridio, morgieb, Moss, Noble One, NZTailender, Riggins, RossTaylorsBox, sachin200, slowerball, social, Stapel, straw man, thundaboult, vandem, _Ed_
nice
Nah, it really did. Appearance of it being a poor decision are ratcheted up when you see he was looking at a different replay for the LBW and raises question whether the RTS was even on the right delivery. The ABC commentators, the Channel 9 commentators all acknowledge it was a poor decision.this never happened bud
They're still in the numbers just not shown on the list of members.Not to mention invisible ****s like me.
dittoNot to mention invisible ****s like me.
Trying to hide from your tastin'Not to mention invisible ****s like me.
#tasteIt's Adelaide. Like I said earlier in this thread, they could grow an azalea on a good length and it'd still be a road.
... and acknowledged by a few more who get paid to watch and write about cricket, go and look at the Guardian, SMH etc. The words they use include "howler" and "farce".Nah, it really did. Appearance of it being a poor decision are ratcheted up when you see he was looking at a different replay for the LBW and raises question whether the RTS was even on the right delivery. The ABC commentators, the Channel 9 commentators all acknowledge it was a poor decision. .
NZ could have just batted better in their second innings... and acknowledged by a few more who get paid to watch and write about cricket, go and look at the Guardian, SMH etc. The words they use include "howler" and "farce".
If Aussie has cruised to a 7 wicket win today we could have looked back and said that the mistake didn't really affect the result of the game. But now we can't.