• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** New Zealand in Australia 2015

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
hahaha, smith. it goes both ways. when it isn't clear whether a catch is taken cleanly you always see batsman sticking around and pressuring the umpires to check the catch.
 

Flem274*

123/5
how howise after your wind up this morning the boss has delayed big daddy kane passing him in hundreds scored and gone past his score in this match

#getrekt #agribusinesssharepricefalls
 

jcas0167

International Regular
Smith's not wrong to wonder why the umpires shouldn't check the replays on their own initiative when in doubt. Would help improve the accuracy in decision making.
 

Cabinet96

Hall of Fame Member
shut up Smith this is not a new phenomenon for claiming catches
Reviews have really confused commentators on this stuff. I was watching the India v South Africa test and the commentators were saying because Faf was given out on the field, them checking the catch had carried meant that the fielder got the benefit of the doubt. The umpire checked to see if it carried, it wasn't a ****ing review, there's no benefit of doubt to the umpire in such a situation.
 

jcas0167

International Regular
Reviews have really confused commentators on this stuff. I was watching the India v South Africa test and the commentators were saying because Faf was given out on the field, them checking the catch had carried meant that the fielder got the benefit of the doubt. The umpire checked to see if it carried, it wasn't a ****ing review, there's no benefit of doubt to the umpire in such a situation.
They're probably confused because usually they do only use it on review by a player. It shows the usefulness of umpires using the technology to assist with their decision making in the first instance. They should be able to do the same with other decisions as I think Smith is suggesting.
 
Last edited:

Athlai

Not Terrible
Taylor's greatest innings. I know the SL knock was gun, but the pushing through his form issues, making it through the Starc spell and a big daddy hundred. This is his best.
 

adub

International Captain
I learnt a painful lesson about writing off Mitch Johnson, but there is night and day between 150k+ MJ and 140k MJ.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
How come Johnson seems to have reverted to his old self?
I'd say this is a bit different from the old Johnson. It's more like he's lost a yard of pace and on unhelpful surfaces that makes him a lot less effective given he doesn't have the tricks of some.
 

Top