Neil Pickup
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Blaze said:England have no reason to be happy
Pick one.Blaze said:Obviously you should be happy with the extraordinary comeback
Blaze said:England have no reason to be happy
Pick one.Blaze said:Obviously you should be happy with the extraordinary comeback
Neil Pickup said:Pick one.
Better!Blaze said:Fair enough.. I didn't explain myself well. All i am basically trying to say is that there were stages where both teams were in the box seat and could have pushed for the win. Australia will be dissapointed that they didn't finish off England and England should be dissapointed after their bowlers set such a great platform for the batsman.
Neil Pickup said:Better!
The way I see the psychological afters is that whilst Australia were in "winning" positions (at 33-5, and then 167-8) and only once in a "bad" one (196ao), England only ever got to "good" positions (196ao, and maybe 134-5) and also experienced one "atrocious" position (33-5) so should (and will) be more content with the final tie.
Selectors and Ponting were less than average today.Crazy Sam said:problem for ponting was that he realised that hogg really wasn't the greatest fifth bowler option. unfortunately, neither was hussey ! symonds bowled great once again.
i'm actually not too unhappy with this, the australian bowlers did pretty well and gave the top order a tough time of it, and when you throw warne into the mix we shouldn't do too badly. there were some overs and balls from the pacers though that were quite ordinary in the last 20 overs.
well thats just your opinion eddie which i agree with, but at this stage their is no way Read will be playing in the ashes.luckyeddie said:Would I pick Read for The Ashes?
Oh, yes.
Why?
Because Read is a better keeper. Saying that, Geraint is, like Gilchrist, a perfectly capable catcher of the ball. If we have 5 hard, bouncy tracks this summer, then the Giles question won't come into the equation (that would be a huge shame, no-one should run scared of Warne when there are enough Aussies to be worried about already) and then you want a catcher, not a keeper, and the gap narrows.
Next question....
Neil Pickup said:
it shouldn't but his innings helped Australia get to a respectable score.marc71178 said:Why should 4-0-31-1 when less than 8 an over warrant any recognition?
Flintoff and Harmison have, IMO, bowled as well as anyone this summer.luckyeddie said:I know - but I'll see your Tresco outside off stump and raise you one Ponting falling over to the off. The Aussies have been exposed in exactly the same way by England's attack - we could be in for one of the lowest-scoring Ashes series of all time.
Somehow, I doubt it.
For the record, I agree with much of what you say - yes, even about Trescothick - but just occasionally take your blindfold off. You missed a cracking match today.
Well its true that Dizzy just hasn't looked himself on tour yet & with the 1st test just around the corner time is running out for him.luckyeddie said:although Gillespie is rapidly falling in my estimation
For me, the key man hasn't set foot on English soil yet, and that's the only 'proper' opening bat either side possess - Justin Langer.
in 2002 in a triangular series in Kenya againts Pakistan when rain fell & before that in the Aiwa Cup in 99 when SRI beat them by 8 wickets if my memory is correct.tooextracool said:wonder how long back we'd have to go since the last time australia didnt win the final of an ODI tournament(in which they played in)?
Last ODI innings?age_master said:well Glenn McGrath played apropriatley for probably his last ODI innings.
Ahh I see. I thought for a second he'd announced retirement or something.age_master said:with the substitutions i doubt he will ever bat in an ODI again