• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** 'My Current World XI' Thread

aussie

Hall of Fame Member
kvemuri said:
Ahh actually in the third post of this this thread or so, think his second post, he did say that.
oh well my apologies sanz, but again i agree with your initial side
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
A lot of people are overlooking Pollock, I think. He's a quality ODI bowler still due to his accuracy, even if he's declined hugely in tests, and he's a good hitter as well. Certainly a better option for number 8 or so than most.

Sachin Tendulkar
Chris Gayle
Rahul Dravid
Kevin Pietersen
Yuvraj Singh
Andrew Flintoff
Mahendra Dhoni (k)
Shaun Pollock
Daniel Vettori
Muttiah Muralitharan
Shane Bond
 

SA

Banned
Chris Gayle
Sachin Tendulkar
Shoaib Malik
Rahul Dravid (C)
Inzamam-Ul-Haq
Yuvraj Singh
Andrew Flintoff
Kamran Akmal (WK)
Shaun Pollock
Shoaib Akhtar
Muttiah Muralitharan
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
adharcric said:
How can you possibly take Akmal over Dhoni in ODIs?
I picked Akmal, but there's plenty of reasons. One of the obvious ones is that Akmal has actually played a little bit of cricket outside of the subcontinent and done okay, while Dhoni has not played anywhere else in either form of the game.
 

adharcric

International Coach
FaaipDeOiad said:
I picked Akmal, but there's plenty of reasons. One of the obvious ones is that Akmal has actually played a little bit of cricket outside of the subcontinent and done okay, while Dhoni has not played anywhere else in either form of the game.
That's true, but Akmal hasn't been such a force in ODIs. Dhoni has already made his presence felt, hell he's 5th in the ICC rankings. Akmal is clearly the better keeper and could well end up as the better test batsman as well, but there is no way I'd take him over Dhoni right now in ODIs ... Dhoni's been far too dominant.
 
Last edited:

Jono

Virat Kohli (c)
There's no way you'd pick Akmal ahead of Dhoni. If you don't want to select Dhoni because he hasn't played much outside the sub-continent, only Zimbabwe, then you select Sangakkara.

Dhoni and Sangakkar have, up till now, been far superior in ODIs. Far far superior.
 

adharcric

International Coach
FaaipDeOiad said:
A lot of people are overlooking Pollock, I think. He's a quality ODI bowler still due to his accuracy, even if he's declined hugely in tests, and he's a good hitter as well. Certainly a better option for number 8 or so than most.
Definitely. I was surprised no one before me picked Pollock when I named my XI. He's still very economical and that's huge in ODIs. Pathan is also being overlooked, people seem to be underrating him because of his lack of pace but he's been devastating with the new ball and more than handy with the bat.
 
Last edited:

adharcric

International Coach
Jono said:
There's no way you'd pick Akmal ahead of Dhoni. If you don't want to select Dhoni because he hasn't played much outside the sub-continent, only Zimbabwe, then you select Sangakkara.

Dhoni and Sangakkar have, up till now, been far superior in ODIs. Far far superior.
Precisely. There isn't even a hint of debate on this issue, Akmal shouldn't be in a World ODI XI as long as Sangakarra and Dhoni are there.
 

cameeel

International Captain
Chris Gayle (WI)
Adam Gilchrist (Aus)
Ricky Ponting (Aus)
Rahul Dravid (India)
Kumar Sanggakara (SL)
Inzamam Ul-Haq (Pak)
Andrew Flintoff (Eng)
Brett Lee (Aus)
Daniel Vettori (NZ)
Glenn McGrath (Aus)
Shane Bond (NZ)

12. Brian Lara (WI)

Unlucky: Jacques Kallis (SA), Muttiah Muralidaran (SL)
 

Sanz

Hall of Fame Member
adharcric said:
Precisely. There isn't even a hint of debate on this issue, Akmal shouldn't be in a World ODI XI as long as Sangakarra and Dhoni are there.
Point is Akmal is a better wicketkeeper than both Dhoni and Sangakkara. I want a Wicket Keeper first and then a batsman and it's not like he can hold a bat. He actually bats pretty well as well.
 

adharcric

International Coach
cameeel said:
Chris Gayle (WI)
Adam Gilchrist (Aus)
Ricky Ponting (Aus)
Rahul Dravid (India)
Kumar Sanggakara (SL)
Inzamam Ul-Haq (Pak)
Andrew Flintoff (Eng)
Brett Lee (Aus)
Daniel Vettori (NZ)
Glenn McGrath (Aus)
Shane Bond (NZ)

12. Brian Lara (WI)

Unlucky: Jacques Kallis (SA), Muttiah Muralidaran (SL)
Four Aussies ... Watch out for Sanz now. I'd be careful if I were you. :unsure:
 
Last edited:

adharcric

International Coach
Sanz said:
Point is Akmal is a better wicketkeeper than both Dhoni and Sangakkara. I want a Wicket Keeper first and then a batsman and it's not like he can hold a bat. He actually bats pretty well as well.
Wicketkeeping is more important in test matches and Dhoni's weakness is only when standing up, which will be for about 10 overs with this World XI. I'd take Dhoni's ability to single-handedly win the match with the bat over Akmal's sharpness with the gloves.
 

Top