Turbinator
Cricketer Of The Year
I have a strong feeling that England will really lift their game tomorrow.
I would be very surprised if Jimmy isnt dropped tomorrow. As you have already mentioned the selectors patience with bowlers over the past few years is far less than that for the batsmen. In addition to Finn, Jimmy was dropped for the t20, Sidebottom was dropped after failing to get through his injuries and Harmison has been completely left out of all plans since the Ashes 2009. Honestly though I couldnt care less if they did, partly because Chennai was the one pitch where Jimmy bowled well against SA (perhaps also the only place where the conditions were in his favor so far this wc), but largely because he'll more than likely be replaced by Tremlett who is a pretty terrible ODI bowler.Hope the selectors grasp the nettle and drop Jimmy.
They weren't afraid to make the big call to drop Finn in the Ashes, who was our leading wicket taker but whose profligacy had cost us dearly in a low scoring test at the WACA. Surely being expensive is even more of a sin in limited overs cricket?
I think two spinners is a must for Chennai, so think Yardy is likely to replace one of Colly or Ravi. I'm not sure if it says more of his decline as a batsman or our lack of spinning options, but we almost miss KP as much for his offies as his runs just now.
Sorry mate but I think you have got it wrong with regards to a tie/washout happening in the ENG vs WI game, if this were to happen then England would be out no matter if Bangladesh win or lose because they (England) would then have 6 points same as Bangladesh (and WI) but they would have less wins (2 against 3), and the number of wins is used before NRR, it's explained here:-Haha, you crazy kids.
If England lose this game they will be knocked out, and Bangladesh will go through. If they win, tie or it is rained out, they will progress, assuming South Africa beat Bangladesh. If the Deshis get up, it doesn't matter what England do today.
It's all explained here.
Then England are out due to less number of wins than the other teams, see here:-What if the game ties?
CorrectThen England are ****ed.
only if England win, not in the event of a tie/washout as they would be out, see aboveEngland will need Bangladesh to lose to SA
No they would be out, see aboveNo, they will be in a good position to go through, given SA beat Bangladesh.
Nope, number of wins has a higher precedent than NRR, see aboveI think 8ankitj is responding to a WI-Eng tie scenario - then if Ban loses to SA, Eng will go through on NNR.
Ta, missed that.Nope, number of wins has a higher precedent than NRR, see above
Nope. The first tie breaker is wins and not NRR. So if England tie they are out.No, they will be in a good position to go through, given SA beat Bangladesh.
Where did you hear that? I couldn't see anything on cricinfo or the BBC.Luke Wright in for Anderson.
My mistake - in for Collingwood. Still...
Yeah. Can be little doubt Swann is a grub, tbh.Lost a bit of respect for Swann after his moaning and cribbing about the dew. Not at all appropriate for an international cricketer and reflected badly on his professionalism to be prepared. Darren Sammy made a chuckle worthy comment on the issue.
That said, this will be a tight game. A