• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official***Match #27- Australia vs New Zealand - October 28th-Dharamsala (D)

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Why is Starc still bowling holy ****.
The most frustrating thing is that it's not like Australia don't have other options. Head could do OK against two lefties and Marsh bowled a decent over earlier.
 

Jumno

First Class Debutant
This game is nicely set up, we have a good game on our hands

Would be nice is NZ get over the line
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Dunno how easy it'll be but the goal for New Zealand should be to take little risk and tap it around at a run a ball up until over 30, then treat the last twenty like a T20. If all remaining wickets are still in hand 180-190 off the last 20 overs is doable. Feel like one more wicket within the next few overs would blow it all open.
Losing a wicket hurts but 181 off 20 is pretty doable. The good news for New Zealand is that no-one's pulled a Mitch Marsh even if no-one has pulled a Travis Head.
 

morgieb

Request Your Custom Title Now!
We’ve definitely batted overs 10-30 better than Australia but that 120 off the first 10 was insane
Yeah had you kept us to 90 off the first 10 this would be a legitimate 50/50.

Did that hit the stump?
 

Top