• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official***Match #21- India vs New Zealand- October 22nd-Dharamsala (D/N)

straw man

Hall of Fame Member
I don't know the answer, though it seems like this tournament 150km/h just disappears to the boundary faster. So it may be better if he only uses the quick one as a surprise ball and otherwise focuses on accuracy and variations.
 

The Hutt Rec

International Vice-Captain
This has also been bugging me in a different way - because the NZ/Indian cricket media already did a variation on exactly the same coverage 2 years ago when Ravindra saved his debut test in India. The "what a find for NZ" and "how cool for a young player of Indian heritage to succeed in India" angles were already covered.

I get that he hadn't previously shown his prowess as an attacking batsman at international level but it legitimately feels like they've forgotten he's already been there. I guess I expect too much.
Ian Smith seemed completely bewildered in the first game’s pre-match that he’d been selected to bat 3 lol.
 

thierry henry

International Coach
Ian Smith seemed completely bewildered in the first game’s pre-match that he’d been selected to bat 3 lol.
I've said too many times before that I can't stand Smith's commentary but....yeah

I get that his role is "lead commentator" and not analyst. Still, it's not a great trade-off, the potential gravitas he might give a big moment (which is something I've never personally understand because I don't perceive him that way at all) versus the reality that 99% of his commentary is him demonstrating he has no idea about modern cricket.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Re: Ferguson, prior to this WC from what I'd seen his speeds had still been good despite him being ineffective. However, most of the short balls I've seen him bowling here have been like 135-138kph? The quickest stuff I've seen from him has been low 140s.

Ironically, while still being expensive, he's actually started taking wickets again though. Do we reckon his rhythm is off, does he have more up his sleeve, or is this all that 32 year old Lockie can muster now?
I reckon he's bowling within himself a bit because his radar was so far off for a while.
 

Moss

International Captain
I don't know the answer, though it seems like this tournament 150km/h just disappears to the boundary faster. So it may be better if he only uses the quick one as a surprise ball and otherwise focuses on accuracy and variations.
This. On these surfaces against the better sides, you need to mix it up and use the bouncer and yorker judiciously (as Bumrah has shown). Ferguson’s played enough whiteball cricket in India so he’ll be aware of it. So should Latham/KW.
 

Top