• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Match 20 - Sri Lanka v Australia

Who will win this match?


  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .

Woodster

International Captain
Pretty big stretch to say that Watson is a better bowler than Krezja on this surface, and I'm a big Watson fan. Ball is turning and spin was looking fairly threatening.

There's also the over rate issue but that takes a back seat in this case since Krezja was definitely the best choice.
Yes think that Krejza is a better option that a couple of the quicks in these conditions, flexible approach from Ponting not just bowling his quicks their full allotment just because they're generally the better options, the pitch is turning and looks difficult to dominate the slower bowlers, therefore give them more overs.
 

Crazy Sam

International 12th Man
If I were Australia I'd be thanking my lucky stars if this turns out to be rained out.

I think they'd struggle to chase anything beyond 200-210 batting second on that pitch.

If it's rained out then I guess it comes down to the Australia-Pakistan game for 1st place?
 

Spark

Global Moderator
My concern now is that we go into the quarters with some of our blokes having barely had a hit in weeks and weeks because of the gigantic breaks in between games.
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Pretty big stretch to say that Watson is a better bowler than Krezja on this surface, and I'm a big Watson fan. Ball is turning and spin was looking fairly threatening.

There's also the over rate issue but that takes a back seat in this case since Krezja was definitely the best choice.
Disagree

Even allowing for the fact that it's debateable as to whether we actually need a specialist spinner (I personally dont see the point), the batsmen have been been allowed to rebuild with minimal pressure

Get the decent bowlers back on, thank your lucky stars that the spinners werent belted in their 10 overs and stop falling into the trap of saying "it's the subcontinent, we must bowl a spinner"
 

Spark

Global Moderator
Eh? Social, you come up with some weiiiiiird stuff at times. The pitch is turning heaps, the spinners have kept the run rate down and the pacers haven't looked very threatening, and you're saying don't bowl more than 10 overs of spin?
 

Spark

Global Moderator
We only need another hour and a half of play possible for it to be a match, remember.

"Only".
 

xanderbiscuits

U19 12th Man
bbc radio said that it will be a little over 3 hours from now until they call it off. They only need 20 overs more of play to complete the match

no ton for sangakkara :(
 

social

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Eh? Social, you come up with some weiiiiiird stuff at times. The pitch is turning heaps, the spinners have kept the run rate down and the pacers haven't looked very threatening, and you're saying don't bowl more than 10 overs of spin?
Hold the press, a spinner has turned it in SL! :laugh:

Our spinners have not, as expected, taken any wickets.

What's more, they have only been marginally more economical than the guys who have and less than the others despite having the benefit of a turning pitch and more boundary cover

Face it, there is no rule that says you must play a spinner and we've seen ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to suggest that Krezja could do a job with the ball (let alone bat) that a Hastings, Siddle or Hopes couldnt
 

vcs

Request Your Custom Title Now!
CRICKETERS' ARK UPDATE: Garfield Sobers, Wasim Akram and Mike Yardy arguing over who should take the two left-handed all-rounder spots.
:laugh:
 

Woodster

International Captain
Hold the press, a spinner has turned it in SL! :laugh:

Our spinners have not, as expected, taken any wickets.

What's more, they have only been marginally more economical than the guys who have and less than the others despite having the benefit of a turning pitch and more boundary cover

Face it, there is no rule that says you must play a spinner and we've seen ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to suggest that Krezja could do a job with the ball (let alone bat) that a Hastings, Siddle or Hopes couldnt
Would suggest Krejza has caused slightly more trouble than some of the quicker options. The pacers come on to the bat and are the SL batsmen look to be able to play them much easier, would think before the break that SL were waiting for the pacers to return to help improve their run rate.
 

Top