Yes he worked the ball around better, still only one boundary after he reached fifty, and Yuvraj had been brought into the attack also, with the mis-firing Sreesanth back on. Like I said before I don't want it to sound like I'm holding him responsible, just thought the way he played today was curious.I think he definitely lifted a gear once he reached 50 after 28 overs.
He was 50 from 71 balls, so his last 20 runs were from 15 balls, he just got out at an unfortunate time for himself and the team.
Violently disagree. Very nice to have someone call a spade a spade rather than running through the usual media-trained inanities. Nice to see some personality.
Well as a fan I love it, but I'm thinking it from within the team perspective.Agree with this. We can't have it both ways - want honesty then pan people when they give us just that.
Decent effort with the bat from the Bangas chasing an insane total. Thought they did pretty well considering.
They scored 287 against the WC favourites.All the head-patting coming Bangladesh's way is a wee bit emetic. Atherton and Wilkins were at it on the comm and there's been a few posts here suggesting they somehow did well in losing by 87!
Was a pretty awful effort IMHO; at no point after Sreesanth's party piece did they ever look like matching the asking rate and barely made much of an effort to even try. Made for a pretty ordinary chase IMHO.
True. They did try initially but once they realised it was highly improbable that they would even get close, they did all they could to bat out the 50 overs and make a decent score instead of going all guns blazing and capitulating to 200 all out. They have to think about their net run rate too.They scored 287 against the WC favourites.
They batted well. Not being able to chase down 370 is hardly an indictment on them as a team.
Yeah, although I don't think they'd have got particularly close to that score if that's what they were chasing. India were obviously quite happy to see them go at about 5rpo for most of the innings and Dhoni's captaincy reflected that. Only when Sree was bowling did they actually get on top of India and disrupt Dhoni's plans.They scored 287 against the WC favourites.
They batted well. Not being able to chase down 370 is hardly an indictment on them as a team.
& they did it against a team more than happy to let them. If they'd batted first and achieved it, kudos, but India will be made up to have restricted a side to fully 1.5 RPO less than their own rate.They scored 287 against the WC favourites.
They batted well. Not being able to chase down 370 is hardly an indictment on them as a team.
I wonder if they'll drop Shafiul for Nazmul after that mare. I think it'd be a mistake but I can definitely see it happening. I'd probably be more inclined to bring Shuvo in if I was forced into dropping Shafiul.Bangas can do well if they bat as well against Eng, SA, WI imo. Their spinners should be way more effective against these teams and pacers should do better than this too.
I think you're judging the spectacle rather than their performance.& they did it against a team more than happy to let them. If they'd batted first and achieved it, kudos, but India will be made up to have restricted a side to fully 1.5 RPO less than their own rate.
I don't think it was a good chase at all and, favourites they may be, but that mantle isn't based on India's bowling strength.
They actually bowled well IMHO. 'Twas an absolute road. As I said yesterday during the game India's 370 looked largely effortless. Sehwag scored 175 at better than a run a ball but rarely got out of first.I think you're judging the spectacle rather than their performance.
The bowlers don't bowl to get carted. Zaheer and co. tried.
Nah. I'm pretty sure they won't drop Shafiul. Should drop Naeem instead. And Mahmudullah should be axed too imoI wonder if they'll drop Shafiul for Nazmul after that mare. I think it'd be a mistake but I can definitely see it happening. I'd probably be more inclined to bring Shuvo in if I was forced into dropping Shafiul.
Nah, if it wasn't Bangladesh we'd be saying how they'd swallowed it and never given it a go. But because it's "little" Bangladesh the "pat on the head" mentality prevails.I actually reckon they bowled well as well. Which makes Bangladesh' score good IMO. They still scored 233 runs from the non-Sree**** bowlers
9 down is as good as all out. What if they went down slogging and were 250 all out? I honestly don't think they would have reached any closer to the target, in fact they probably got to 280+ just because India let them. If they tried to force the issue they'd probably start losing wickets and end up with a poorer NRR in the group.Nah, if it wasn't Bangladesh we'd be saying how they'd swallowed it and never given it a go. But because it's "little" Bangladesh the "pat on the head" mentality prevails.
Losing by 87 when you haven't been bowled out is an arseholing for my quid.
Brumby, why haven't you acknowledged the importance of net run rate? Honestly, if you were to pick 1 team where net run rate is going to be the most important, it would have to be the 5th ranked team in the group Bangladesh.Nah, if it wasn't Bangladesh we'd be saying how they'd swallowed it and never given it a go. But because it's "little" Bangladesh the "pat on the head" mentality prevails.
Losing by 87 when you haven't been bowled out is an arseholing for my quid.