The other way round. There was enough talk about Ramesh Powar, but they confused him with Rajesh Pawar. Luckily, they got the right man. Unluckily, they don't have him now. He was running hot with bat and ball in 2002 and 2003 and could have been an automatic selection, and he's run out of steam now. Hopefully he'll have a very good match with both bat and ball.viktor said:you mean, as in chose powar when the wanted to select pawar???!!!
You wouldn't. He hasn't played a Test or ODI. Indian domestic matches are not even shown in India, let alone the US. I had seen clips of the man in action in the Duleep final, but nothing more.I haven't seen Gagandeep.. heck I haven't seen int'l cricket for a while now.
If you have to keep for India, batting is no concern- it's how you keep to spinners that counts. Saba Karim was the best wicketkeeper batsman the team ever had- he could actually get into an Indian top-6.About Samant, I dunno, he has apparently always kept well but has never ever been in contention. His batting, from all accounts is also not too bad.
Didn't get this one. Whom was this aimed at ? Samant or Kaarthickmarc71178 said:Considering he has no confidence in his keeper, his recent form is rather good.
Anybody, be it Dropgupta, Parthiv or Dravid.V Reddy said:Didn't get this one. Whom was this aimed at ? Samant or Kaarthick
KumbleV Reddy said:Didn't get this one. Whom was this aimed at ? Samant or Kaarthick
No, I meant I haven't even seen int'l cricket for a while, let alone domestic cricket.Arjun said:You wouldn't. He hasn't played a Test or ODI. Indian domestic matches are not even shown in India, let alone the US. I had seen clips of the man in action in the Duleep final, but nothing more.
Isn't he playing for Baroda now? Thats good, will atleast keep him in contention if he keeps performing.Arjun said:The other way round. There was enough talk about Ramesh Powar, but they confused him with Rajesh Pawar. Luckily, they got the right man. Unluckily, they don't have him now. He was running hot with bat and ball in 2002 and 2003 and could have been an automatic selection, and he's run out of steam now. Hopefully he'll have a very good match with both bat and ball
The national selectors have been following a pollicy of selecting keepers who can bat a bit; that is why Deep Dasgupta got anywhere near the national squad. Agree about Samant, he has been good with the spinners, may be will get a chance if KArtick fails.Arjun said:If you have to keep for India, batting is no concern- it's how you keep to spinners that counts. Saba Karim was the best wicketkeeper batsman the team ever had- he could actually get into an Indian top-6.
But lack of the necessary skills is what caused that awful career-terminating accident in Dhaka, with Kumble bowling. Deep Dasgupta's struggles to keep to Kumble are well known. No wonder, ever since Mongia was dropped, he has never had any confidence in any other keeper, since only Mongia had the skills to keep to Kumble. A famous wicketkeeper even said that he's the best international keper not in a national side.
Samant has been keepnig to spinners who hunt in twos and threes for a long time, for Assam as well as for Mumbai. He could keep to them while they were in great wicket-taking form and that shows that his glovework is good, since keeping to spinners is the true test of keeping skills.
Gagandeep has been running hot, repeatedly knocking over bating sides cheaply, so his selection was on the cards. Nehra was only warming the benches, given his recent record, so this move was a good one. It's better if he makes the starting lineup.Neil Pickup said:Incredibly, Gagandeep has been called up to the India 15 to play Bangladesh in place of Ajit Agarkar. If Pathan or Zaheer are unfit at any point, it will be between Gagandeep and SS Paul for the second seamer's place.
Hopeflly Yusuf Pathan will outperform him with bat and ball. Baroda needs its younger players to perform more, not the has-beens and Mumbai extras. Yusuf can bat quite well, though his bowling has been weak so far.Isn't he playing for Baroda now? Thats good, will atleast keep him in contention if he keeps performing.
Yeah, Yusuf did pretty well in the 1st match IIRC. As for Rajesh Pawar being a Mumbai extra, he was unlucky that he had to compete with Nilesh Kulkarni. Zaheer also went to Baroda after he couldn't crack the mumbai side, so not all Mumbai extras are useless.Arjun said:Gagandeep has been running hot, repeatedly knocking over bating sides cheaply, so his selection was on the cards. Nehra was only warming the benches, given his recent record, so this move was a good one. It's better if he makes the starting lineup.Hopeflly Yusuf Pathan will outperform him with bat and ball. Baroda needs its younger players to perform more, not the has-beens and Mumbai extras. Yusuf can bat quite well, though his bowling has been weak so far.
Gagandeep has been performing really well in the Ranjis and much as I would like to see AAin the national side, he has had enough opportunities. Maybe a full domestic season will do him some good. He has already hit 2 half centuries, albeit against weak attacks, and has a fifer.Neil Pickup said:Incredibly, Gagandeep has been called up to the India 15 to play Bangladesh in place of Ajit Agarkar. If Pathan or Zaheer are unfit at any point, it will be between Gagandeep and SS Paul for the second seamer's place.
I was talking about Kumble.V Reddy said:Didn't get this one. Whom was this aimed at ? Samant or Kaarthick
Bombay has done nothing of the sort - Vinod Kambli was unwell on the morning ofArjun said:It's about time the selectors take some tough steps for the benefit of Indian domestic cricket, even if it means droppign old non-performers. At least Tushar Arothe from baroda has retired, and so have the spinners. The Mumbai side have thankfully dropped Vinod Kambli.
Bombay does *not* have enough runs in Morris, Powar, Bahutule, Agarkar andArjun said:They have enough runs in Morris (he's a frontline batsman), Powar, Bahutule, Agarkar and ven Samant, so five specialist batsmen are enough. One good thing about Mumbai is that there are so many multi-skilled players in the side, but they would be a lot better if they played against the Indian senior players more often.Hopefully these pitches are of Test standard, not like Mumbai2002, Mumbai2004 and those minefields in NZ..
BTW, I dont even think its a very bold prediction that RP Singh will get a shotArjun said:Let's see how consistently he gets wickets, at what average. A more reliable choice is Gagandeep Singh, who has played six times as many FC matches, and has taken over 150 wickets at an average of 20. He has maintained that average for six seasons, as the breakup on CricketArchive.com suggests.
No point picking someone on the basis of his age and his first performance- one just needs to remember Ambati Rayudu. He slogged 221 runs against a weak Andhra attack, but got scores of 0 and 1 against a strong Mumbai attack, yet there were (and still are) a few who think he's good enough for the Indian team. In the Challenger series, his shot selection was terrible. Let RP Singh get a full season so that he can prove himself. If he bowls at express pace, the selectors may watch him, but their pace options should be restricted to those has-beens in the Indian side, with Gagandeep, Amit Bhandari, Avishkar Salvi, Irfan Pathan and SteamShip. The selectors don't need more medium-pacers. They need all-rounders and tearaway fast bowlers.
Not seen him, but talked to people who have. Very aggressive (runs in hard,Arjun said:By the way, has anyone seen Gagandeep Singh anywhere? How tall is the man? I had seen clips of a Duleep match and he's quite muscular. Hopefully he's built like a fast bowler.