**Official** India v Pakistan

[Deja moo]

That's when it's bold and I wanted to emphasize those first 4 letters. Clearly, that's not what they had in mind.

CW had better sort this out soon ( as someone mentioned somewhere, try writing "night watchman" as a single word )

 

[Deja moo]

Does anyone else think that Afridi is a bigger threat with the ball than kaneria, against the Indians ?

 

[Unattainableguy]

Peace . It was all in good humor buddy.

That wasn't any humorous at all.

 

[Nate]

Does anyone else think that Afridi is a bigger threat with the ball than kaneria, against the Indians ?

hes good, thats all I know. and Im serious. hes consistently testing these two, he needs a breakthrough! if only Younis couldve hung on.

 

[shaka]

Congrats to Karthik on his maiden Test 50, good support for Dravid too.

 

[infiniti]

That wasn't any humorous at all.

Ok it was not. Peace anyways.
Another 4 by Dravid.

 

[Nate]

as soon as I post, Dravid and Karthik up the anti and take him on! and theyre winning!

 

[Unattainableguy]

And since you have retailated similarly, I expect the same action to be taken against you too.

So you see why I had to retaliate similarly( look down). Surely, he would have continued on with that had I not.

Ok it was not (humorous). Peace anyways.

Peace anyways and great batting by Dravid and Karthik so far.

 

[Sanz]

And where is that in the rules?

I knew you would come up with that stupid one liner :-

"9.(c) (i) After agreeing to play in unsuitable ground or weather conditions, either captain may appeal against the conditions to the umpires before the next call of Time. The umpires shall uphold the appeal only if, in their opinion, the factors taken into account when making their previous decision are the same or the conditions have further deteriorated.
(ii) After deciding to play in unsuitable light, the captain of the batting side may appeal against the light to the umpires before the next call of Time. The umpires shall uphold the appeal only if, in their opinion, the factors taken into account when making their previous decision are the same or the condition of the light has further deteriorated."

Now before you come up and post another useless one-liner asking if Sachin was the captain, here is another rule :-

"9. Suspension of play for adverse conditions of ground, weather or light
(ii) For the purpose of this Law and Law 15.9(b)(ii) (Intervals for drinks) only, the batsmen at the wicket may deputise for their captain at any appropriate time."

http://www.lords.org/cricket/lw_0000000029.asp

I am sure you will come up an explanation to suit your argument.

 

[infiniti]

Wasnt that out???

 

[Nate]

an amazing 40 out of Karthiks 70 runs have been scored from boundaries! Not much running for him.

 

[Unattainableguy]

I would like to see an Indian stand up and say that was a wrong decision by Bucknor to not give Dravid out off Khalil.

Edited: Oh, as I'm typing this, one has already.

 

[Sehwag309]

Dravid survived here, Bucknor doing self-karma or what???

 

[Sehwag309]

Wasnt that out???

...it was, but the sachin one at that stage was more of a scare than this

 

[Nate]

pitching out-side leg?

 

[Sehwag309]

OK, I got it

Bucknor Hates Sachin
Bucknor Loves Dravid

 

[Sehwag309]

pitching out-side leg?

I will get the gif image at tea time and then c.web experts can discuss

 

[Sehwag309]

OK, lets talk Declaration here,, I feel Ganguly wont do it soon enuff

 

[Sanz]

I would like to see an Indian stand up and say that was a wrong decision by Bucknor to not give Dravid out off Khalil.

Edited: Oh, as I'm typing this, one has already.

83.1 Mohammad Khalil to Dravid, no run, the ball pitches outside leg,
hit Dravid plumb in front of the stump, huge appeal by Khalil, but
once the ball is outside leg, no chance of the batsman bneing
given out, Khalil almost ended up pleading for a wicket

I dont understand how it is a bad decision ?

 

[Nate]

I will get the gif image at tea time and then c.web experts can discuss

sounds good to me!