• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

**Official** India v Pakistan

Choora

State Regular
Oh God... Dravid gone too... This could be a big win for Pak.

Looks like India lost the match the moment they lost Sehwag.Very unprofessional performance by Indian batsmen, the way they chased the target, they looked like amatures.
 

Choora

State Regular
I wonder why Ajit Agarkar (not my fav player) wasn't played and Pathan got the nod.

Pathan did a wonderful job with the ball, throughtout the series, the so called "Baroda bombar" was fabulous!
 
Last edited:

Choora

State Regular
Nnanden said:
He will be, I`m sure. Pakistan are just finding out the best spots for all this talent. :)

And Kaneria! SO EXPENSIVE! Man, now I know what everyone was on about. Sorry for the mistake guys!
Kaneria is going for lot of runs, still i think he should get chances in ODI
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
Nnanden said:
Malik to bowl?! I guess that`s expected, you don`t normally go into a game with only five bowling options.
Some sides go in with 4 and hope to make up the 10 through a variety of part-timers.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
GladiatrsInBlue said:
Shouldn't the batsmen refuse to face Malik when he will be throwing???


I mean why should Indian batsmen face throwers???
Well Pakistan didn't refuse to face Harbhajan.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
deeps said:
the biggest issue will be how many overs are going to be docked??? why isnt anyone mentioning that
Because unfortunately the over rate deductions never seem to be applied any more.

If only they were done so on a rigid basis - maybe we'd see the game sped up by all captains.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
deeps said:
he is allowed to bowl, but if he gets called, he won't be allowed for 12 months i believe.
I think that's only if it's still found to be dodgy surely?

A bit harsh if it's on being reported if he's subsequently cleared!
 
marc71178 said:
7-1-24-4 (including the wicket of Gilchrist)

Allright, one good performance, maybe he's not so bad.


India are still trying to get to the target.Had Sehwag not gone early things would have been different, Dhoni did scare the hell out of Paks, but unfortunately he didn't last long.


Oh no, Malik is actually bowling now ..... thats criminal :@
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
deeps said:
can some1 explain why there was 0 overs docked?
Afraid not, but it doesn't look like it'll be a crucial factor.

I note that Pathan didn't finish an over, assuming that is for injury (and not because he was bowling more pies than usual) then maybe that was a reason for some of the delay?
 
marc71178 said:
No, the only disgrace is you, troll.
Actually you are a disgrace urself.

I had reason to object to Malik's bowling as he bend his arm more than the allowed limit, thats not the case with Bhajji or even Murali.
 

marc71178

Eyes not spreadsheets
GladiatrsInBlue said:
Allright, one good performance, maybe he's not so bad.
Actually looking at his numbers, there's only 1 Indian seamer better than him - so doesn't say a great deal about your side then does it?
 

Top