You're having a decent bat over Amit Mishra?I must amit mishra is a decent bat.
He's actually batting 9.>TFW your number 8 is capable of Ranji 200s and playing perfect reverse sweeps, yet your team only has 366 runs on the board.
Nah man Luggage wins epic world cup semi-finals.Well not a bad innings I guess. Wish we had Bhuvi ffs. Binny is luggage.
Haha the best thing is the fact that they actually refuse to list more than ten just because of how absurd it gets after that. They used to actually admit that was the reason on the site and everything.That ICC test all rounders ranking list always gets a laugh from me. Throws up some of the most absurd names.
Me. For. No. Reason. OfcourseAnyone here think Sanga is not going to get a 150?
I'm not of the opinion that India have a capable 5th bowler likely to improve their chances of taking 20 wickets. Certainly not an all-rounder. I'd prefer then to bat with the above and play Ashwin/Yadav/Mishra/Ishant.I agree - but what's the best selection to get 20 wickets in away tests?
Yeah the main difference being that Ishant is better than Ishant, Ashwin is just better than Jadeja was, and 2 of Umesh/Mishra/Bhuvi is better than old, fat Zaheer and the crap that Shami has bowled lately.I'm not of the opinion that India have a capable 5th bowler likely to improve their chances of taking 20 wickets. Certainly not an all-rounder. I'd prefer then to bat with the above and play Ashwin/Yadav/Mishra/Ishant.