Shri
Mr. Glass
Hurts me to say this, but I agree.I love Ishant..but Aamer is better
Hurts me to say this, but I agree.I love Ishant..but Aamer is better
3 wickets at almost 50 run average is quite threatening indeed.Yeah, just needs another 5-10kms of his pace back to look threatening again. Like when he started. Then CC will be clogged up by Ishant Vs Amir threads.
Did you even watch the match today? I did. I know what I am talking about and I am open to debates about his performance with someone who actually watched the game.3 wickets at almost 50 run average is quite threatening indeed.
Ishant bowled well for only 4-5 overs early. He was rubbish after that and the tail enders took him to cleaners.Did you even watch the match today? I did. I know what I am talking about and I am open to debates about his performance with someone who actually watched the game.
Do you have a problem with the Lankan tail enders showing him a place he could get his clothes laundered? It's not like Ishant knows his way around Galle.Ishant bowled well for only 4-5 overs early. He was rubbish after that and the tail enders took him to cleaners.
Do you have a problem with the Lankan tail enders showing him a place he could get his clothes laundered? It's not like Ishant knows his way around Galle.
I could assume as much by reading a cricinfo article. I conclude that you didn't watch the game.Ishant bowled well for only 4-5 overs early. He was rubbish after that and the tail enders took him to cleaners.
Vaas would have demolished a line up on that conditions. Ask English and Aussies if you don't believe. Indians got best of conditons to bowl, but kept bowling some rubbish too. It was on such a day where Kulasekara (who is a lesser Test seamer than Ishant) and Herath reduced Pakistan to rubble. If they applied them selves and caught well, could have got SL all out for 350Looks like Ishant might be finding some form
Sri Lanka v India: Fiery Ishant interrupts normal service | Cricket Features | Sri Lanka v India | Cricinfo.com
I havent seen the game..so cant really comment.. But reducing Pakistan to a rubble is hardly something I would take too seriousy..Even Geoffrey Boycott's mom could bowl them out..Vaas would have demolished a line up on that conditions. Ask English and Aussies if you don't believe. Indians got best of conditons to bowl, but kept bowling some rubbish too. It was on such a day where Kulasekara (who is a lesser Test seamer than Ishant) and Herath reduced Pakistan to rubble. If they applied them selves and caught well, could have got SL all out for 350
Hmm. Not convinced.Kulasekara (who is a lesser Test seamer than Ishant)
But this team had Yousuf, Younus and Misbah as well. Clearly quality than what Australia play against in England.These days running through Pakistans test batting lineup is not much of an achievement.
North and Watson did it.
Fixed.WAG, whoever banned Umar_Akmal.
Why is he banned?WAC, whoever banned Umar_Akmal.
Why do you think I don't rate Yousuf, Younis and Misbah too highly? They are not all that..yeah better than Azhar Ali, Umar Amin and Imran Farhat..not really saying much..But this team had Yousuf, Younus and Misbah as well. Clearly quality than what Australia play against in England.