AWTA. Australia took a 200+ run lead after a 350ish score (and a collapse early on day 2) in 2009, didn't they? Though that was one of Johnson's "once every 20 Tests" performance. And England did make 500+ and win after bowling SA out for 300 odd last year. Oh well.Yeah, if we don't bowl well we're ****ed anyway. But 250 would be a chance. 275 is a good score on this wicket on day 1 IMO. Anything close would be good.
Fixed.Haha, I'm happy we crossed 150 in total. Considering that, 250 seems like a fighting score. If Zaheer Khan doesn't come to the party here then we're toast.
I have just forced myself to forget our 620/4 dec performance. Let's see.Fixed.
It might actually work in India's favour, if the batsmen decide to throw their bats around. Even if they go off for bad light, it is hard to see these two surviving Dale Steyn on a fresh wicket tomorrow morning.If the fielders actually can't see, surely they've gotta go off for bad light. i wanna watch cricket but it could get ridiculous here.
Meh, not everything I say is as an Indian supporter. If the fielders can't see the ball its unfair, just like if the batsmen can't see the ball.It might actually work in India's favour, if the batsmen decide to throw their bats around. Even if they go off for bad light, it is hard to see these two surviving Dale Steyn on a fresh wicket tomorrow morning.