Kweek
Cricketer Of The Year
you honour your name.JustTool said:DROP TENDULKAR !
Have been saying this for few years on these Boards. He is a businessman milking the gullible Indian fans. Amazing.
you honour your name.JustTool said:DROP TENDULKAR !
Have been saying this for few years on these Boards. He is a businessman milking the gullible Indian fans. Amazing.
Your mindless worship of underperformers is what's wrong with Indian cricket. Let's see Tendulkar "high" scored - what 31 ? with 2 chnaces - and India lost BADLY.silentstriker said:Long time no see. I like how you seem to come on every time India does not do well. Last match when he high scored, you were conspicuously absent.
O' great one, please enlighten us with someone who has better technique or has better chance to cope with the wickets in South Africa except Dravid and Tendulkar. Name one.JustTool said:Your mindless worship of underperformers is what's wrong with Indian cricket. Let's see Tendulkar "high" scored - what 31 ? with 2 chnaces - and India lost BADLY.
None of these guys are playing to make the country proud - only for endorsements. It's a pity to decalre them (national) heroes.
If I only cma ehre when India did not do well, I would be here all the time. I don't have that kind of time for these pathetic losers - starting with the BCCI.
Your Cricket knowledge is whats wrong with fans. You consider a score of 35 bad? No matter what the situation is, the team could have everyone go past 50, and have one batsman score 35...35 will still be a decent score so I don't now what your on about.JustTool said:Your mindless worship of underperformers is what's wrong with Indian cricket. Let's see Tendulkar "high" scored - what 31 ? with 2 chnaces - and India lost BADLY.
None of these guys are playing to make the country proud - only for endorsements. It's a pity to decalre them (national) heroes.
If I only cma ehre when India did not do well, I would be here all the time. I don't have that kind of time for these pathetic losers - starting with the BCCI.
I agree with you that Tendulkar got a bit unlucky today. He didn't miss time that shot and we all know 9 out of 10 times he would get that to the boundary. Sehwags shot however had a little bit of edge and went flying to third man for a decent catch. Seriously if he doesn't do anything in the next two games, drop him. And if they don't, then the BCCI are idiots.adharcric said:Openers
Sehwag's inability to deliver at the top is quite pathetic for such an experienced, established player. Gambhir needs to be recalled after this tour - if not to replace Sehwag, at least to put some pressure on him. Tendulkar's full-blooded pull unfortunately landed straight in the hands of the fielder today, but he fires occasionally enough and is clearly the best opener we have.
We have two series coming up before the World Cup. It was originally one series, but BCCI changed into two with 4 ODIs in each. Thats a good idea really. Laxman should be selected for the time and play atleast all 4 matches to get used to the team again just in time for the World Cup.adharcric said:Middle-Order
Dravid's return to #3 was good to see but we do need experience later in the order as well. Kaif is flattering to deceive but he's still performed adequately given the (lack of) opportunities he's gotten of late. Mongia and Raina will probably get another match or two in this series. Raina is pretty much heading back to domestic cricket but Mongia will probably retain his place simply because he can bowl. With Yuvraj absent and Raina disappointing, Laxman and Badrinath must return. Let Ganguly score some more runs for Bengal.
It would be a good idea to have him switch with Dhoni every now and then for keeping during games. He's fielding was pathetic from the 4-5 times the ball was played to him. I'm not sure if thats how he normally fields but I don't blame him either because he is a keeper.adharcric said:Wicketkeeper
One of the few positives on this tour has been Dhoni's batting. He has churned the singles quite well and yesterday's dismissal was not such a rash shot - simply good field placement and a brilliant catch. Karthik also looked pretty good with the bat yesterday in the time he spent at the crease. If Raina and Mongia aren't going to score runs, I don't see anything wrong with playing Karthik as a specialist batsman on this tour. In fact, his athleticism really helps our close-in fielding and somewhat makes up for the absence of Yuvraj and Raina in the field.
Agarkar seriously shouldn't even have been picked for the two matches. A couple of random wickets out of no where should not be good enough to pick him over all the bad balls he bowls and gives away so many runs. Sreesanth should be the option atleast for the next ODI and see how he does before thinking about giving Agarkar a go at the 5th.adharcric said:Seamers
Pathan bowled well in the beginning apart from a few short balls but got butchered at the death - nothing unexpected though, he's always been a poor death bowler. Agarkar and Zaheer should've fared better, but they also bowled the wrong (good) length to Kemp and Hall. The need for a bowling coach has never been more obvious. This group of five is our best right now, but Agarkar must be dropped for the next match. Sreesanth should be given a chance - he's a wicket-taking option unlike Agarkar and would surely have something to prove after falling out of favor with the management. He also generates good pace and seam/swing movement and may excel on these pitches.
Harbhajan didn't do any better in CT either so it would be a really good idea to rest him and go with four bowlers if Munaf isn't fit in time.adharcric said:Spinners
Kumble was brilliant and exuded his class. Harbhajan has looked poor so far in South Africa - time to bench him as well.
Pathan should use majority of his overs with the new ball, there was no point in bringing in Agarkar with the new ball. If India want to play three seamers, I believe it would be a better idea to let Pathan stay in the team instead of Agarkar. Sachin can take over for the death overs because he is probably the second best death over bowler we got. If India play four seamers, there is no point in not letting Pathan bowl with the new ball.adharcric said:For the next match, we should only play one spinner. Either play three seamers and leave out Pathan or play four seamers and include him.
Unless Pathan learns to bowl at the death, we can't go in with three seamers if Pathan is one of them ... that's suicide in the death overs.
Who was dropped at short mid-on? I believe it was Hall who was also dropped by Dravid. Indias fielding is also to blame for the situation they got themselves in(Apart from Kaifs runout which was the best piece of fielding I have seen since De Villiars run out against Australia)adharcric said:Interesting that no one has mentioned Jerling's missed call when Kemp edged a Kumble delivery down the leg side.
That was definitely a turning point in the South Africa innings, along with Tendulkar's botched return catch.
Kemp's innings is being overrated IMO - he played well, but the death bowling was horrendous, he had 3 or 4 chances and the straight boundaries were very short.
Kaarthick's fielding was hardly pathetic. It was only when he was in the boundary when Kemp was going berserk that he actually misfielded the ball. Otherwise, he was diving around. Sure, he had trouble actually catching the ball but that's probably because he is used to catching them with the gloves on. Anyways, if we are going to play both Kaarthick and Dhoni, why not let Kaarthick keep wickets? No offence to Dhoni, but Kaarthick is still the better keeper, and by quite a margin, I dare say seeing how Dhoni let those byes go off Harbhajan down the legside.Dravid said:I agree with you that Tendulkar got a bit unlucky today. He didn't miss time that shot and we all know 9 out of 10 times he would get that to the boundary. Sehwags shot however had a little bit of edge and went flying to third man for a decent catch. Seriously if he doesn't do anything in the next two games, drop him. And if they don't, then the BCCI are idiots.
We have two series coming up before the World Cup. It was originally one series, but BCCI changed into two with 4 ODIs in each. Thats a good idea really. Laxman should be selected for the time and play atleast all 4 matches to get used to the team again just in time for the World Cup.
It would be a good idea to have him switch with Dhoni every now and then for keeping during games. He's fielding was pathetic from the 4-5 times the ball was played to him. I'm not sure if thats how he normally fields but I don't blame him either because he is a keeper.
Agarkar seriously shouldn't even have been picked for the two matches. A couple of random wickets out of no where should not be good enough to pick him over all the bad balls he bowls and gives away so many runs. Sreesanth should be the option atleast for the next ODI and see how he does before thinking about giving Agarkar a go at the 5th.
Khan was pure brilliance in his first spell. He just seems to have lost his rhythm in the 9th and 10th over. He should still be in the squad for the upcoming series against SL and WI and stay in the squad for the World Cup.
Harbhajan didn't do any better in CT either so it would be a really good idea to rest him and go with four bowlers if Munaf isn't fit in time.
Pathan should use majority of his overs with the new ball, there was no point in bringing in Agarkar with the new ball. If India want to play three seamers, I believe it would be a better idea to let Pathan stay in the team instead of Agarkar. Sachin can take over for the death overs because he is probably the second best death over bowler we got. If India play four seamers, there is no point in not letting Pathan bowl with the new ball.
yeah, but isn't it true that Dhoni can bowl decent seam up stuff at around 125 to 130 kph? For all we know, he could actually fare better than Pathan and AA.adharcric said:Karthik is miles ahead of Dhoni behind the stumps, but IMO Karthik can be a very good close-in fielder for India even without the gloves. I'm not so sure how Dhoni will fare in the field without the gloves and I don't think a quality keeper is as crucial in ODIs as it is in tests.
Definitely worth a shot - India would have the ultimate all-rounder who bats, keeps and bowls.honestbharani said:yeah, but isn't it true that Dhoni can bowl decent seam up stuff at around 125 to 130 kph? For all we know, he could actually fare better than Pathan and AA.
Not exactly. I mean, he would still have competition from Andrew Hall, Mike Hussey and AB De Villiers, I guess.adharcric said:Definitely worth a shot - India would have the ultimate all-rounder who bats, keeps and bowls.