He's like the test cricket version of Afridi.I think Pant might not end up with great numbers like Gilly but I'll find it more satisfying if he continues playing these outrageous knocks like he has done so far. We keep talking about Gabba but he has played some exceptional knocks even before that.
ewHe's like the test cricket version of Afridi.
no that's Shannon GabrielHe's like the test cricket version of Afridi.
Still think you need to look at getting Pant out, rather than try and tie him down. He's gonna score quickly regardless anyway.It could go both ways though, SA wouldn't like a quick 20-30 runs here.
Only with the bat though, tbf to Gabriel.no that's Shannon Gabriel
Still here, SA still need to pick a spinner... still not nonsense. 4 fast bowlers weakening the batting because you don't want to make a choice between Olivier and Jansen, still terrible selection. Not first time this has happened, nor will it be the last no matter how many times SA has been bitten by the stupidity of it all.Where is Stephen and his sa need to pick a spinner nonsense,
A big ew actually and Pant has proven himself to be efficient under really tough circumstances unlike Afridi.Why ew? Afridi in ODIs was brainless batting with extraordinary display of batsmanship in between on occasions. Yeah Pant is slightly more well oiled/efficient than Afridi, I give him that.
Worst comparison. Pant plays more quality innings against top class bowling in clutch situations than most legitimately world class specialist top order test batsmen.He's like the test cricket version of Afridi.
No, all batsman who score at any kind of fast clip in any format are the same.Worst comparison. Pant plays more quality innings against top class bowling in clutch situations than most legitimately world class test batsmen.
there's levels to it though. Pant shows moments of stupidity in between batting fairly lucidly. Afridi's entire batting career was a never-ending stream of (hugely entertaining) red-blooded stupidity, the only variable was whether the stupid shot went for six or not.Why ew? Afridi in ODIs was brainless batting with extraordinary display of batsmanship in between on occasions. Yeah Pant is slightly more well oiled/efficient than Afridi, I give him that.
FTFYWorst comparison. Pant plays more quality innings against top class bowling in clutch situations than mostlegitimatelycurrent worldclassspecialist top order test batsmen.
He is inconsistent and suicide bombs an innings once in a while but you can’t take away what he has achieved in 25 tests.
I love Afridi and think he's seriously underrated as a Test cricketer, but Pant has already accomplished more in his short career than Afridi ever did. The peak of Afridi's test batting was smashing around lackluster bowling attacks on flat pitches, mostly in Asia. Pant's already had match-winning, and in some cases series-defining, innings overseas and in tough conditions. An innings like today could have never come from Afridi.He's like the test cricket version of Afridi.
I think this is very optimistic. High 30s, maaaybe shade over 40 at best, which would still be great.Pant's very much comparable to Gilchrist imo. Gilly didn't make his FC debut till he was 21 and his Test debut till he was 28. Pant is only 24 and he's already got 3 Test tons and an average of 37. Don't think he'll end with a career average of 47 like Gilly did, but he could end up in close enough.
IDK, I think his best years are ahead of him. He's barely had a chance to downhill ski/score heavy on flat decks in his career so far, and it's natural that as he matures his output with the bat should increase. Barring any injuries/shocking loss of form I think he should end with a career average over 40. Dhoni ended up with 38 and I definitely think Pant is at least 3-4 runs better than that.I think this is very optimistic. High 30s, maaaybe shade over 40 at best, which would still be great.