Pujara survived two such LBW calls when he was on zero!Oh **** off.
Amla so lucky to survive there. Looked absolutely dead, ****ing umpire's call.
So?Pujara survived two such LBW calls when he was on zero!
So, Amla was not particularly lucky, to get an Umpire's call decision in his favour. In any case it was the correct decision unlike the second Pujara call.
How does Pujara being lucky suddenly mean Amla isn't lucky? They're not mutually exclusive. And no one was ranking decisions in order of which was more correct than the other. Or saying that Pujara was not out. Why even bring Pujara into this to begin with?So, Amla was not particularly lucky, to get an Umpire's call decision in his favour. In any case it was the correct decision unlike the second Pujara call.
There is always going to be some snarky comment when some one complains about an umpiring decisions going against their team but is silent when a dodgy goes for his/her teamHow does Pujara being lucky suddenly mean Amla isn't lucky? They're not mutually exclusive. And no one was ranking decisions in order of which was more correct than the other. Or saying that Pujara was not out. Why even bring Pujara into this to begin with?
I know that massive chip on your shoulder affects your ability to reason logically, but you could atleast try. This is just lazy.
Lol. No mirrors at your joint?How does Pujara being lucky suddenly mean Amla isn't lucky? They're not mutually exclusive. And no one was ranking decisions in order of which was more correct than the other. Or saying that Pujara was not out. Why even bring Pujara into this to begin with?
I know that massive chip on your shoulder affects your ability to reason logically, but you could atleast try. This is just lazy.
Heh, the irony, Just don't go crying to the mod this time.I know that massive chip on your shoulder affects your ability to reason logically, but you could atleast try. This is just lazy.
Genuinely don't know what you're referring to here.Lol. No mirrors at your joint?
You seem to think people are a lot more bothered by this than they actually are.Please keep whining about how "lucky" the SA batsmen are being with the "umpire's call", Indian bros. I want to see this continue.
Yeah. It's like people assume these things are mutually exclusive.Just because SA have had luck doesn't mean they didn't bat well too. It's like they say, you make your own luck. India did themselves no favours in their innings with the number of loose strokes. If you bat well and get some luck going your way, fair enough. That's how the sport works.