• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in South Africa 2017/18

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Saha and Jadeja averaged in the 40s in 2017; Ashwin averaged 17. I don't think his batting is in form enough to push him UP the order at this point...
It sounds like you are disagreeing with me, but we are saying the same thing.

SillyCow thinks ashwin should bat ahead of Saha, I dont think he should.
 

Shri

Mr. Glass
I quite like Saha ahead of Ashwin on more lively wickets against good attacks.
Ashwin's a decent bat away from India though. Averages 35 in england, 27 in Aus with two 50s, 58 in WI etc compared to his home average of 30. Saha and Jadeja are worse than him when playing away from home. I would give him a few more games before moving him down the order because it looks like a form issue rather than a skill issue to my untrained eyes.
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
Speaking of crapinfo, why are previewing this series just from an india perspective. Each day another preview of how india should counter said SA player. It's almost as bad as Firdose writing...
That's pretty much the coverage that any series involving India gets. If you click on the series home page India tour of South Africa 2017/18 Scores, Fixtures, Tables & News - ESPNcricinfo
everyday there's a new feature, analysing individual players, video diaries, a bit of history from past India-SA series, and in general a lot more daily news and reporting on the Indian team.
 

Salamuddin

International Debutant
Think SA playing De Kock at 6 and Vern at 7 is something that India should be pleased with.
India's challenge away from home has always primarily been taking twenty wickets. SA playing one specialist batsman less and the wickets being lively will help India's bowlers.

I don't know whether it will happen this time round but
I actually genuinely feel that India are going to win a series in SA at some point in the next decade.

The wickets are livelier in SA than in Australia and I think India's bowlers have a better chance of getting 20 wickets there than in OZ. Also, the talent gap between the two sides has decreased considerably.
In the 90's SA produced far better cricketers than India. However post 2000, India have improved considerably - the win percentages of each Indian captain since March 2000 has continued to improved.
India's A and u-19 sides are stronger than their SA counterparts now.

I think if Indian cricket continues to improve, a series win in SA is going to happen within the not too distant future.
 
Last edited:

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
I'd love to see a breakdown of home/away... curious if standing closer to the stumps due to the low bounce in India has any effect on the catching
(clutching at straws here :))
I'd agree that standing up too quickly has been the biggest issue but I'm fairly certain plenty of waist height grabs have been spilled as well.
 

Spark

Global Moderator
I'd agree that standing up too quickly has been the biggest issue but I'm fairly certain plenty of waist height grabs have been spilled as well.
There's definitely been quite a lot of catches dropped where there's no logical explanation for them at all
 

Black_Warrior

Cricketer Of The Year
The way Kohli is sharing his post married life on Social media, I think we all know who is going to be blamed at the sign of first defeat.
 

SeamUp

International Coach
Sigh seems Faf isn't getting what he demanded...
I'm not too overly worried.

It might suit us to go in with the 6-5 split then at Newlands especially.

Flint is a good groundsman. No doubt he would have done everything he could to produce a bit more what SA wanted but generally he produces good pitches there. Alright he may be trying to turn Newlands more bouncy and quicker with not as much wear and tear as a usual Newlands but if he produces something like that here then I think SA would be happy.

A bit of a concern is that there is likely to be unseasonal rain on Sunday for the whole day. Peaking around 12 at 55% chance.
 
Last edited:

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
The pitch may be a bit drier than we would like but as long as it is not to slow and/or flat it should be fine. It's not like we gonna see a dust bowl...
 

Dendarii

International Debutant
A bit of a concern is that there is likely to be unseasonal rain on Sunday for the whole day. Peaking around 12 at 55% chance.
I'm not entirely sure how I feel about the prospect of rain during the test. On the one hand it means no cricket but on the other hand it's rain, which is so desperately needed.
 

SeamUp

International Coach
I'm not entirely sure how I feel about the prospect of rain during the test. On the one hand it means no cricket but on the other hand it's rain, which is so desperately needed.
Definitely. Desperately need it. I read if we don't get enough unseasonal rain , water supplies will run out end of April.

But during the cricket :@ :D
 

StephenZA

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
I'm not entirely sure how I feel about the prospect of rain during the test. On the one hand it means no cricket but on the other hand it's rain, which is so desperately needed.
We need the rain in the catchment areas not over the cricket ground.... Rain in the mountains leave the cricket alone, is that so much to ask?

Definitely. Desperately need it. I read if we don't get enough unseasonal rain , water supplies will run out end of April.
Seriously, I heard March because of the influx of visitors to CT this summer..... it is starting to get ridiculously dire.
 
Last edited:

Dendarii

International Debutant
Seriously, I heard March because of the influx of visitors to CT this summer..... it is starting to get ridiculously dire.
I know at one stage it was the end of March, then it moved to the end of May, and more recently the official data was the end of April. Although I did read something the other which suggested that it may have moved back to June (not sure whether it's the beginning or end of June). It does seem to move around quite dramatically, but if they're calculating it based on recent consumption and dam levels then there's a bit of a double whammy - increased consumption results in a bigger drop in dam levels (and reduced consumption a smaller drop), then large movements in the date can happen.

Although it doesn't take into account the various projects that are being put into place (tapping into aquifers, desalination plants, etc.). So once those start producing water then "Day Zero" will be pushed back, hopefully to when the rains start to arrive, but I don't think anyone actually knows whether we'll get enough rain this year.
 

Top