this has probably already been mentioned but am not going to check 368 pages - As it turned out India showed they had the capability to get a result from the series. they were the better team for 4 out of 5 days in 1st test, and looked comfortable at start of 2nd. Poor selection screwed them up, I don't know if that's Fletchers fault or bcci. 1st test should have picked 4 seamers for the Wanderers pitch ie inc B kumar, indias best seamer of last 18months and in 2nd test picked ashwin AND jadeja for Durban - the only pitch in SA known to spin. I blame fletcher, he most be familiar with those two venues. And most importantly Nohit sharma for neither- the walking wicket meant india was playing a batsmen light from the start. Yes he has talent, but no guts or mental determination for overseas cricket as all of pujrara, Vijay rahane kohli all demonstrated they have in abundance. Indian domestic scene is overflowing with talented batsmen,(more than most countries) why persist with ignoring sharmas frailties. Steyn put it best in sharmas futile argueing from the non strikers end - "we are playing in Durban, not india -do something . useful in your career, then talk" , With a half decent batsmen at No5, indias lineup looks strong.
Ishant sharma is another story, just when hes on the verge of being dropped, he comes up with an imprressive spell, as he did in the 1s test- and all of india dreams again he could be indias answer to Morkel. but he never delivers 2 matches in a row. its time to invest in alternatives. I like sandeep sharma , b kumar, Shami was impressive. , a fit and firing zaheer would be like golddust- but I don't believe hes fit enough for a whole series