But I maintain the Pak attack is better. Shoaib does make a difference. Of the first 39 overs, he has bowled 15 (out of a maximum possible of 20) from one ned and conceded 45 runs. Can you imagine what the run rate would have been if he wasnt there.
Also can you imagine what Sehwag would do to Agarkar
Facing the Indian attack even Dravid may have been scoring at 60-65 runs per 100 balls on this wicket.
Our being 180 not out does not make our bowling attack better. If Pakistan could have scored better than 679 for 7 at that rate against their own attack, that would settle the argument