G.I.Joe
International Coach
I'd say 365 days in a year. No more.I'd say practice match + 3-test series.
I'd say 365 days in a year. No more.I'd say practice match + 3-test series.
I'd say 365 days in a year. No more.
Indeed. If you take into account that the Indian series started 10 days after the end of the aussie tour, and that holding a test match in April is hardly ideal to start with, it's silly to say they should've booked a practice match in with the 3 tests.I'd say 365 days in a year. No more.
Interesting, last I heard was that India requested 3 test matches?"India have bent over backwards to accommodate our wish for three Tests so we have to give them some warm-up," Vaughan was quoted as saying in the Dominion Post. "I said to them: `We won't leave you in the lurch, we will give you some decent warm-up,' and one way or the other we will honour that."
Cricinfo - Indians could get practice games
But of course, it's the BCCI so it must be all their fault.
FFS Get a life. That article is dated over a month back."BCCI secretary N Srinivasan said he was delighted that both the boards were able to agree on an extended tour. "My thanks go to New Zealand Cricket for responding positively to our request for an extended Test series"
Cricinfo - India to play extra Test and Twenty20 in NZ
To go alongwith the Pakistan teams to whitewash Australia, you've posted in the past?NZ 20/20 team to white wash India 2-0
Ryder
McCullum
Guptill
Taylor
Elliot
Broom
Oram
Vettori
Southee
Butler
Brien/Thompson
i would worry more about Akhtar and whether he would be fit for the next game if i were you tbhIs Thompson as good as Mills and will Mills be fit for ODIs???
Calm down.FFS Get a life. That article is dated over a month back.
He was merely pointing out that one article stated the NZ cricket board requested three tests and the other article stated the Indian board requested three tests. A useful point for discussion.FFS Get a life. That article is dated over a month back.
I hope Elliot doesnt get picked for 20/20. And Thompson is poor. He is an average domestic cricketer. He bowls little medium pace 125 change ups and bats down the order. He is one of those allrounders who does a little bit of both but is not great at either .NZ 20/20 team to white wash India 2-0
Ryder
McCullum
Guptill
Taylor
Elliot
Broom
Oram
Vettori
Southee
Butler
Brien/Thompson
Oh FFS! Have you seen his 20/20 performances this season? He's averaged 9.66 at a strike rate of under 100. If you're going to promote a player on the argument that "well, I've never seen him play real cricket and have no idea about his technique and abilities, but he's better than that other guy coz he's got teh potential!!!" (), at least make sure that he's actually performing at domestic level. Anderson would be an even more ludicrous selection than Trent Boult.I hope Elliot doesnt get picked for 20/20. And Thompson is poor. He is an average domestic cricketer. He bowls little medium pace 125 change ups and bats down the order. He is one of those allrounders who does a little bit of both but is not great at either .
Maybe give that young Anderson guy a go. The indians dont have any extreme pace bowlers that might ruffle a young guy. It will be at home and a couple of 20/20s cant really hurt him, but give him a chance and exposure to the top level.
Haha, classic Matt post. Slag off a guy who can't bowl 140 and advocate using an unproven young guy instead.I hope Elliot doesnt get picked for 20/20. And Thompson is poor. He is an average domestic cricketer. He bowls little medium pace 125 change ups and bats down the order. He is one of those allrounders who does a little bit of both but is not great at either .
Maybe give that young Anderson guy a go. The indians dont have any extreme pace bowlers that might ruffle a young guy. It will be at home and a couple of 20/20s cant really hurt him, but give him a chance and exposure to the top level.
I've put him on ignore. Can understand the jealousy. Can't understand the trolling.To go alongwith the Pakistan teams to whitewash Australia, you've posted in the past?