• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official India in New Zealand***

Flem274*

123/5
cricinfo saying they're two wickets away from the tail:huh: Franklin yeah I can see the point but McCullum anyone?

Also the wicket of McIntosh will automatically come according to this guy. Haha, arse saving 50 from McIntosh at the end of the series anyone?
 

Flem274*

123/5
Cricinfo must have Bracewell with them, they can't figure out why we don't line the team up like:

Opener
Opener
Taylor
Ryder
McCullum
Flynn
Franklin

:detective:
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
NZ's batting is very bottom heavy anyway, and Don Ryder has yet to come to the crease.
NZ lower order is bound to fail at times too. Law of averages eventually catch up. Only Ryder and Taylor are class players. You are over rating the NZ line up when you think they are likely to make 600. Possible but not probable.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
Pratters not doing Franklin McCullum and Vettori justice IMO.

But totally agree on his comments about Ryder and Taylor, Ryder more assured, Taylor the stylish.
 

Pratters

Cricket, Lovely Cricket
Athlai, it is unlikely that they are unlikely to make 600 was my basic point. Even with how good Franklin, Vettori and McCullum are, NZ are unlikely to make 600. Every thing would need to be going for you from Taylor-Ryder on to make 600 if you are NZ. It doesn't usually happen and NZ don't usually score 600 in an inning.
 

Top