also, it'd be illegalYeah exactly. Four specialist seamers and a filthy part time spinner is a legit option when you have certain strengths and the pitch is a certain way, but that's not what we're talking about here. If the pitch is green enough to justify leaving out a spinner entirely then it's green enough for Colin to be a very serious bowler, in which case I'd just pick another batsman or at least a batting allrounder.
If it's really true with lots of carry it's a different matter again, but that's not what we're talking about here either.
We can play 6 batsmen and just increase Ashwin's workload. Imo as the lead spinner he should be trusted to bowl more than he has been.Ishant ruled out. Awesome. Umesh and Shami in the XI. Get ready for NZ to rack up 600 at 4 an over.
Seriously, I hope sense prevails and we play 5 bowlers. Or leave out the spinner altogether and hope that Vihari can do the job. But going by history, this wicket, no matter how much grass they leave on it, should flatten out by the second half of the first day and then be a road. If that is the case, I will still go with the below XI:
Mayank
Vihari
Pujara
Virat (c)
Rahane (vc)
Pant (wk)
Jadeja
Ashwin
Umesh
Shami
Bumrah
The question is not that. When you need to bowl more than 120 overs, you need a decent 5th bowler. And I do not back Shaw to score more runs than Jadeja.We can play 6 batsmen and just increase Ashwin's workload. Imo as the lead spinner he should be trusted to bowl more than he has been.
Why do you think that? Toss results don't seem to affect India's results much at home.Good stuff - nice to see the coin toss not going India's way. Need to see this Indian team put up. You want to be the best? This is when you prove it.
On a more global note, I would support getting rid of the toss and letting visiting teams pick (India would lose more than they'd gain, but still) but it's too hard for any team to win overseas and this would make the games more even.