not really.... more of a pro-Indian bias though, given that it is where most ppl access that site. Cricinfo is only marginally better than some of the **** Indian media outlets.... They play on the emotions of the Indian fans and project larger than life (and obviously false) images of all their players... Just that they don't go down to the ridiculous levels that the other Indian media do....Not being able to follow much of this test on TV, I get my info from crickinfo. However, last friday, I did get to see some English wickets fall, in the evening. I was quite shocked by Cook's first Innings dismissal. Sipping at my beer, watching the TV-screen, I immediately could see that ball might have been too high. And it was! Yet Cook was given LBW by Taufel (of Ganguly's bowling).
So, I check the latest score yesterday. Nowhere a single comment about Cook's badluck. Cricinfo's life comment didn't even say it was a poor decision. Yet, there were tons of words used to question the wickets of Ganguly and Tendulkar. What is that? For goodness sake, G&T had doen their damage, whereas Cook was anchoring a poor England innings. Nobody likes bad decisions, but they are part of cricket and rule themselves even! Yet cricinfo continues to suggest that India was done wrong. If you want to keeping whining about bad decisions, then at least have the decency to do so unbiased.
Don't get me wrong, I couldn't give a rat's arse about the outcome of this test. I just wonder....., there's an anti-English bias at cricinfo, right?
Ah, it might indeed be more of a pro-Indian than an anti-English bias.not really.... more of a pro-Indian bias though, given that it is where most ppl access that site. Cricinfo is only marginally better than some of the **** Indian media outlets.... They play on the emotions of the Indian fans and project larger than life (and obviously false) images of all their players... Just that they don't go down to the ridiculous levels that the other Indian media do....
Tbf a number of people commented that Cook got a shocker here, including myself.Not being able to follow much of this test on TV, I get my info from crickinfo. However, last friday, I did get to see some English wickets fall, in the evening. I was quite shocked by Cook's first Innings dismissal. Sipping at my beer, watching the TV-screen, I immediately could see that ball might have been too high. And it was! Yet Cook was given LBW by Taufel (of Ganguly's bowling).
So, I check the latest score yesterday. Nowhere a single comment about Cook's badluck. Cricinfo's life comment didn't even say it was a poor decision. Yet, there were tons of words used to question the wickets of Ganguly and Tendulkar. What is that? For goodness sake, G&T had doen their damage, whereas Cook was anchoring a poor England innings. Nobody likes bad decisions, but they are part of cricket and rule themselves even! Yet cricinfo continues to suggest that India was done wrong. If you want to keeping whining about bad decisions, then at least have the decency to do so unbiased.
Don't get me wrong, I couldn't give a rat's arse about the outcome of this test. I just wonder....., there's an anti-English bias at cricinfo, right?
Haha. Love the description mate.Sipping at my beer, watching the TV-screen, I immediately could see that ball might have been too high. And it was!
Both wickets by Zaheer. Your attitude towards Indian pace bowlers is dire.YES! Thankyou God thankyou so much! Finally!
Strauss out!
(Y)Strauss to ton up (Y)
Indeed it was nick, thought the hot spot showed something tbh.Looked like a snick there.