• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** India in Australia

SirBloody Idiot

Cricketer Of The Year
So sad that you call yourself a cricket fan. That was such fantastic bowling - how can you not find something like that absorbing?
Oh bull****. Nobody enjoyed watching Dravid play so dreadfully - even if it was 'ball dominating bat,' he could have done so much better.

Shocker decision there.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Haha, Yuvi given out caught behind. Replays inconclusive. Could've been out twice in eleven balls. Skills Clark.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Bit of poetic justice there. Yuvraj was definitely out to Hogg and probably not out to Clark, at least based on his reaction and the first replay.

Great session again from Australia. A few balls have kept low already and batting is only going to get harder, so if Australia get another wicket early after tea it's going to be extremely hard for India to stay in the match.
 

Turbinator

Cricketer Of The Year
Bull****. I don't ****ing care if Yuvi was out against Hogg, but that's no excuse to give him out when he isn't next over. Pure BS, thought it would make up for Johnson's not out, but nooooooooo they just had to ruin things, ****ing Billy and his crooked finger.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Would love to see Dhoni get a decent hit. Never seen much of him, especially in Tests. Has he a haircut? :O
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Bull****. I don't ****ing care if Yuvi was out against Hogg, but that's no excuse to give him out when he isn't next over. Pure BS, thought it would make up for Johnson's not out, but nooooooooo they just had to ruin things, ****ing Billy and his crooked finger.
Haha Turbs. It's a 50/50 decision at present dude.
 

Prince EWS

Global Moderator
Bull****. I don't ****ing care if Yuvi was out against Hogg, but that's no excuse to give him out when he isn't next over. Pure BS, thought it would make up for Johnson's not out, but nooooooooo they just had to ruin things, ****ing Billy and his crooked finger.
8-)

I don't see why anyone thinks Yuvraj wasn't out other than the fact that he stood his ground. I heard a noise and the bat didn't get anywhere near the ground or his pad. It's not particularly conclusive but I wouldn't jump on the "it was a wrong decision" bandwagon yet.

And to complain about the decision when the man should have been given out in the previous over anyway is pretty dire. I'm sure you're frustrated with it and you're living the moment, but calm down and think about what you're saying.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Bull****. I don't ****ing care if Yuvi was out against Hogg, but that's no excuse to give him out when he isn't next over. Pure BS, thought it would make up for Johnson's not out, but nooooooooo they just had to ruin things, ****ing Billy and his crooked finger.
Haha. You know, when Yuvraj was given not out (incorrectly) to Hogg, I was actually sort of pleased, just because I figured it would stop some of the inevitable whining every time Australia win a match about umpiring bias, as witnessed last night with the largely irrelevant (yet also incorrect) Johnson not out call. Yet, I was wrong.

Assuming that Yuvraj was not out to Clark, he should have been out the previous over. There's no grounds to complain about the umpiring at all. BTW, I think it's a bit of a slap in the face for Yuvraj to compare the value of is wicket to a number 10.
 

Top