Um what? We got 370 odd on day 3 with only 5 down so I don't see how we can't get this score with 10 in hand. It's likely that we get bowled out before that time and lose, but if India actually bat 98 I'd back them to have won the match.By stonewalling?
...Um what? We got 370 odd on day 3 with only 5 down so I don't see how we can't get this score with 10 in hand. It's likely that we get bowled out before that time and lose, but if India actually bat 98 I'd back them to have won the match.
Yeah that's the thing, I just don't see it happening with the kind of batsmen we have and how they approach their cricket. And given how crap our tail is it becomes a big ask for our top batters....
If they decide going for the win is too risky they could do the ABdV-Faf thing and just block all day. In which case they'd bat 98 overs for 200.
Not serious, right?If India actually manage to bat out 98 overs then I can't see how they couldn't have won the game by them.
1/23.What's the score I cbf to check cricinfo and can't find the remote
Hussey played every single format though. Harris doesn't.I agree with you guys. But I also thought the same thing about Mike Hussey, that he would keep playing till he was forced out kicking and screaming, and look how that turned out.