That's good news. But if he can't duck or twist he'd better wear plenty of body protection because he's going to wear a few.Clarkey in the nets practicing upper cutting short stuff. His stance looked very upright too yesterday. Think he can stand still and not duck or twist and he might be able to bat.
Yeah I def noticed this. I was hoping it was just a technical thingClarkey in the nets practicing upper cutting short stuff. His stance looked very upright too yesterday. Think he can stand still and not duck or twist and he might be able to bat.
Nah, still 350 on the board, more than likely to get to 400.As a neutral observer, Clarke's back is a game changer. I'd rather be in India's position than Australia's. This is a good batting deck and it's going to be perfect on day two and three.
I'd take Australia's, given scoreboard pressure. Even if Australia makes 400, which you'd think is a bare minimum, it's a mental mission for a team that travels like a bag of prawns on a warm day. Even if Johnson doesn't get amongst them, which is a big if for a side that doesn't always fancy it, Harris and Siddle are going to make them work extra hard for whatever they get. Australia have plenty of bowling options (presuming Watson is fit to bowl) that they'll be able to rotate and keep fresh. India didn't have that luxury.As a neutral observer, Clarke's back is a game changer. I'd rather be in India's position than Australia's. This is a good batting deck and it's going to be perfect on day two and three.
what teams were those, what bowling attacks?But..... it's Adelaide. The last three bat first scores: 570, 550 and 604.
It's a secret.what teams were those, what bowling attacks?
Anderson, Broad, Swann, Panesar, Stokeswhat teams were those, what bowling attacks?
Yeah.Yes, Australia made 570 last match, but we declared in the third innings 3 down from something like 30 overs. If we get 450, we just need to bat for say 60 overs next time round. Australia are without doubt in the better position.
I've just realised how many hundreds Warner has already.
Jesus ****ing Christ. Is there a list of fastest batsmen to 10 test tons anywhere?
Might be a test vs innings thing - I prefer innings.I think I read that he was the fourth fastest Australian to 10.
Rogers is pretty lucky this test got delayed tbh.Rogers, Watson and Haddin all did nothing yesterday to banish the grey clouds that currently hover over their careers
Indeed, the clouds turned a little more menacing