Is wrong (imho).This
Waverley College?Come on Cowan you good thing!
Would be the first person from my school to represent us in test cricket.
I agree with this, and have never been a fan of trying to manufacture an all rounder, but I will say that when Watson is bowling well he makes our attack soooooooooooo much better.i mean really for me it's just the same as playing smith last year. in that yeah if you put in enough requirements/restrictions/ etc the selection makes sense....but I just wanna put out something like the best team.
CranbrookWaverley College?
I don't think I would, but that's not what I meant anyway.Is wrong (imho).
I'd back Warner, Cowan and Khawaja, to score more than Watson, Ponting and Hussey at the moment.
haha yeh, I don't really get it either. Our team's batting is completely ruining the balance of team at the moment, so surely to the solution is to try and improve the batting to regain some balance rather than weakening it? I'd much prefer to play Watson instead, and rely on a few more overs from Lyon, Siddle and bits and pieces from Hussey etc. if Harris happens to break down.what does playing a person not quite good enough with the bat and not quite good enough with the ball do for team balance?
GPS the great disappointment in non-Rugby sport.Cranbrook
Probably not much tbh. I'd put him as the favourite now ahead of the Christian option to start on boxing day. And good on him too, very classy bat, enjoy watching him play.Seriously, what more does Cowan have to do to get in the Aus Test team?
Do you use that expression in the Literotica sense, or in the sense she's good looking?Cowan does have a hot wife tbf
In the sense that I google image searchedDo you use that expression in the Literotica sense, or in the sense she's good looking?
So it could be either.....In the sense that I google image searched