benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Your number 8 is actually Dhoni aws.India's batting can collapse if two more wickets fall, Our tail begins at number 7 with Dhoni
Your number 8 is actually Dhoni aws.India's batting can collapse if two more wickets fall, Our tail begins at number 7 with Dhoni
Ashwin is at 9!You are forgetting Ashwin - the best no.8 in the world. Got a test 100 and multiple FC tons.
Tail actually begins at 5 now though.Your number 8 is actually Dhoni aws.
Wow; I bet Murphy is blushing now!LOL benchy thats because Ishant was a night watchman.
In India he can be a handy bat, but in bowler friendly conditions, I dont think he will be able to do much.You are forgetting Ashwin - the best no.8 in the world. Got a test 100 and multiple FC tons.
Wow; I bet Murphy is blushing now!
I was playing Captain ObviousWow; I bet Murphy is blushing now!
Haha a mate of mine said the same thing. They'd much rather have that wicket had fallen in the first hour of tomorrow's play!CA spewing. That wicket just cost them 27,000 extra people for tomorrow
I really do think that people are overstating the quality of the pitch
Aside from being hit in the head, Ponting was hit on the shoulder whilst playing a forward defensive
Clarke played on off the glove against a guy bowling little more than medium pace
Hussey was hit on the shoulder by same medium pacer
The ball seamed all day including a near leg spinner from Yadav in the second last over of the day
Ashwin turned and bounced the ball a lot but fortunately bowled very inconsistently
This is a loooooooooooooooooooong way from being a road and we can be thankful that the Indians didnt bowl particularly well
What did you think of the wicket today?With all due respect, I don't agree with this at all. It wasn't a disgraceful road or anything, but it was slow and fairly simple to hit through the line of the ball.
Clarke's dismissal had very little to do with the wicket firstly. Secondly a ball can jump a little bit off the seam at times, even off relatively benign wickets.
Time will tell. Personally if Australia skittle India it will be full credit to their bowlers, not the wickets imo.
The biggest let down was the way we bowled after Hilf and Patto bowled their 1st spell, they had softened Sehwag and Dravid to a large extent and had Lyon and Siddle maintained the same pressure then we would surely have made early in-roads.Na, no way. Pattinson pretty good throughout, though his early spell wasn't on the money. Siddle pretty garbage all the way through, except his last few overs. Hilf lousy all the way through, except his few opening overs. Lyon simply unmenacing. Considering the batting really wasn't that great, aside from Tendulkar, the bowling on the whole was pretty poor.
Will take 1/100 in Adelaide.Have a gut feeling that Ashwin will definitely ton up once this series.
FMLMy friend says...Ishant Sharma will make a Century tommorrow.......HAHAHAHAHAAA...
Please dont tell Ishant...otherwise he will be no more to play 2morrow...!!
Nah I'm gonna go tell him.My friend says...Ishant Sharma will make a Century tommorrow.......HAHAHAHAHAAA...
Please dont tell Ishant...otherwise he will be no more to play 2morrow...!!
Well I'm not sure what's worse tbh - Hilfenhaus lacking the ability to consistently put the ball where he wants, or Siddle not trying to put the ball in a good area. The latter would be fairly easily rectified if he grew a few brain cells, but the former could be a hassle to improve given Hilf is almost 29 and should have mastered those basic skills already.The biggest let down was the way we bowled after Hilf and Patto bowled their 1st spell, they had softened Sehwag and Dravid to a large extent and had Lyon and Siddle maintained the same pressure then we would surely have made early in-roads.
Starting off with Hussey and Siddle after tea was another lame move because it just allowed a bloke like SRT to get off to a flier and dominate the attack.
Also I can't get this whole fuss about Hilf bowling a few leg stump balls and getting whipped to the boundary being such a big deal, his intentions were good but his execution was poor but you would much rather have a bloke bowling full rather than bowling short and wide something Siddle was guilty of doing for most of the day, because Hilf bowls from so close to the stumps his in-ducker tends to drift down the leg stump and that's something that makes the angle for his outswinger pretty acute as well, but then its something that can be easily corrected by him going a bit wider on the crease.
Nah I'm gonna go tell him.
Also I can't get this whole fuss about Hilf bowling a few leg stump balls and getting whipped to the boundary being such a big deal, his intentions were good but his execution was poor but you would much rather have a bloke bowling full rather than bowling short and wide something Siddle was guilty of doing for most of the day, because Hilf bowls from so close to the stumps his in-ducker tends to drift down the leg stump and that's something that makes the angle for his outswinger pretty acute as well, but then its something that can be easily corrected by him going a bit wider on the crease.