They do?CA have the power to stand up to BCCI, they didn't.
Agree tbh.Snicko once again proving that it's the most conclusive piece of technology.
Indian commentary team "difficult decision - fair enough"
Tbf, I think you can thank Warne and Gilchrist for all the shiyte appeals now.Dire, dire decision. Went nowhere near it.
How the **** do you a) give that out and b) appeal for it in the first place? India's been up for everything all day.
Christ, if it was against an Indian player you'd have half a billion people calling for Erasmus' head, twice that calling the Australians cheats for appealing and a tour on the brink of collapse.
Its an absolute farce that technology like DRS isn't being used - even if it doesn't pick up the marginal calls, at least it reverses absolute howlers like that.
And it takes a hell of a lot to make Mike Hussey lose it, pathetic umpiring.
Could have actually voted to make it mandatory. But that would require something more than short term dollar signs to guide their thinking.Yes. Should have refused the tour...
There are various ways you can negotiate..the way BCCI manages to get every other board to agree to them...CA had the power..they could have refused the tour, they could have refused to tour India in the future. India-Australia series helps BCCI as much as it helps CA, so its not like BCCI is doing Australia a favour.Both boards have agree, I think.
ahahahahah what the ****ing ****There are various ways you can negotiate..the way BCCI manages to get every other board to agree to them...CA had the power..they could have refused the tour, they could have refused to tour India in the future. India-Australia series helps BCCI as much as it helps CA, so its not like BCCI is doing Australia a favour.
I **** you not "It's better that a human, the umpire makes a mistake than technology makes a mistake."