weldone
Hall of Fame Member
more awkward than our 2007 WC loss to Bangladesh
more awkward than our 2007 WC loss to Bangladesh
Even when a bit older, it would be useful! Playing English county cricket for a season or two would be very very handy for any cricketer, I'd reckon. Tendulkar, Dravid, Ponting, Lara & Kallis all played county cricket in England, arguably before they had set themselves as all time greats.This is why Indian players need to step out of their country a bit more while they are young. Players in New Zealand and Australia travel to other countries when they are young to play cricket in different conditions, I think this is why they can adjust to games in other countries so well. I have never seen or heard of a player from India do a stint down under trying to develop their game
Bizarre argument. County cricket is of woeful quality.
Nah, it only matters how you go #onthesubcontinentThis is why Indian players need to step out of their country a bit more while they are young. Players in New Zealand and Australia travel to other countries when they are young to play cricket in different conditions, I think this is why they can adjust to games in other countries so well. I have never seen or heard of a player from India do a stint down under trying to develop their game
Agreed. It may not be the same as the 80s and 90s but CC has always been the finishing school for overseas players. Counties put pressure on their overseas players to perform and justify their position. The pressure of performing day in and day out in CC as an overseas pro is related to the ability to handle the pressures of international cricket. It is a different arena but handling pressure and expectation is the same.Even when a bit older, it would be useful! Playing English county cricket for a season or two would be very very handy for any cricketer, I'd reckon. Tendulkar, Dravid, Ponting, Lara & Kallis all played county cricket in England, arguably before they had set themselves as all time greats.
I remember being suspect of Finn's action in 2013. I'm not sure if he gets his arm straight before it's perpendicular with his body. It's a weird one. Touch and go.Finn looks like he's developed a bent arm. When did that happen?!? Also was the speed gun slow? I remember him being around 140-145
Well then to be fair we should also expect Aussies and English players to have stints in India to get used to turners as they mostly struggle on them. In fact Australian conditions is a whole different animal of it's own too.Agreed. It may not be the same as the 80s and 90s but CC has always been the finishing school for overseas players. Counties put pressure on their overseas players to perform and justify their position. The pressure of performing day in and day out in CC as an overseas pro is related to the ability to handle the pressures of international cricket. It is a different arena but handling pressure and expectation is the same.
Same way being an overseas pro in good English club cricket is a tough gig. If you can manage the committee, pressures of performance and criticism then it is a good indicator of translating to performing at a higher level.
Its always easier to adjust to low bounce than it is high bounce as well.. part of the reason in my opinion.This is why Indian players need to step out of their country a bit more while they are young. Players in New Zealand and Australia travel to other countries when they are young to play cricket in different conditions, I think this is why they can adjust to games in other countries so well. I have never seen or heard of a player from India do a stint down under trying to develop their game
Hanging with GIMH heyOne of the guys even asked if Freddie was still the captain, and even he was ribbing me..
India lost 4-0 in 2011. Nothing much changed. Losing 2-0 and batting well in 7 out of 8 innings is a step forward, flat tracks or not. Another 4-0 would not have helped Indian cricket.That's why I actually think not getting thrashed in Australia was actually a negative thing in most ways for India because it gives them that false sense of supremacy. I know the game against England was ODI and that it's a whole different type of mentality but it's still cricket. And if you actually watch the game the reason India sucked so much was because they couldn't cope with the bounce. Majority of their struggles came from that and the commentators were calling it right there.
Back then it was that "come to India and then we will show you" attitude though. It's only after the England thrashing last year that I finally saw the attitude to improve oversees. I'm afraid all that will go to waste with the Aussie series because it will get to their heads imo.That's why I think some livelier wickets and thrashing could have actually helped them stay in the right path. .India lost 4-0 in 2011. Nothing much changed. Losing 2-0 and batting well in 7 out of 8 innings is a step forward, flat tracks or not. Another 4-0 would not have helped Indian cricket.
FMD mate they never looked like taking 20 wickets. Wish these were timeless tests, Australia would still be batting in Adelaide.India lost 4-0 in 2011. Nothing much changed. Losing 2-0 and batting well in 7 out of 8 innings is a step forward, flat tracks or not. Another 4-0 would not have helped Indian cricket.