Cabinet96
Hall of Fame Member
Exactly. And Maxwell, Marsh and Faulkner is one of the stronger finishing trios.80 off the last ten is about par these days tbh
Exactly. And Maxwell, Marsh and Faulkner is one of the stronger finishing trios.80 off the last ten is about par these days tbh
well maxwell and marsh didn't even bat in the last ten (save for like two or three balls maybe) and we had haddin and johnson going nowhere so i'm pretty happy with 80 off 10Exactly. And Maxwell, Marsh and Faulkner is one of the stronger finishing trios.
Which basically means its near impossible to get Aus under 275..No other side comes close to Australia when it comes to Faulkner, Johnson & Starc at 8, 9 & 10.
some question marks on the order of australia
but this is the best xi for now.
warner
finch
clarke
smith
maxwell
marsh
faulkner
haddin
hazlewood
starc
johnson
hahaha i didn't even notice johnson at 11why would Clarke be at 3?
And why would Hazlewood be ahead of Johnson and Starc?
Watson is a has been.You avin a larf? Finch over Watson?
perfect imosome question marks on the order of australia
but this is the best xi for now.
warner
finch
clarke
smith
maxwell
marsh
faulkner
haddin
hazlewood
starc
johnson
Bro . . . he specifically said:why would Clarke be at 3?
And why would Hazlewood be ahead of Johnson and Starc?
some question marks on the order of australia
but this is the best xi for now.
Nah, he's about the most underrated ODI cricketer ever.Watson is a has been.