No chance - don't you read Burgey's posts?a lead for just a couple by close would be nice.
NopeI think the stats guy on TMS was saying 1936/37.
Gotta say the groundsman could look a bit of a moron here if England get 250/300.
The pitch is never going to bounce as much as Perth, hes basically prepared a Headingley or a Trent Bridge or a Edgbaston/Lords in May.
Yes but Australian batsmen don't do that very often.Nope
It's fine if you dont play away from your body and let the ball come to you
Australia are going at 6.2 on Betfair if you want to put your money where your mouth is.Haha.. You were gobbing off like this at Perth. We'll win this match by >120 runs.
English parents, you see...And a great cut there, too. Jackman can clearly play.
Youre awake? Where were you in Perth?Australia are going at 6.2 on Betfair if you want to put your money where your mouth is.
Warne only bowled one proper delivery and it hit Jackman in the guts. The rest was a mix of slow & straight and long hops. Deliberately bowling pies to ingratiate himself with the glitterati. Obviously, Warne's after some female acquaintance of Jackman.Wolverine charging Warnie.
heheh.
This could be it:When was the last time Oz were skittled for less than 100 at home?