NUFAN
Y no Afghanistan flag
Oh yeah of course, my bad.If it had been 3 reds, it would have been out. That's why.
Oh yeah of course, my bad.If it had been 3 reds, it would have been out. That's why.
No but the burden should be on England to call for that review. So they should lose a review if its not out.If it had been 3 reds, it would have been out. That's why.
gif their reaction and harris trollface at the endlol @ england players
I'd like the jury to disregard my last statement.Nah that was an Australian review.
That's not the rules though. But yeah, I can see that. The only problem is that England would have seen multiple replays on the big screen at the ground, so they've still got a big leg up for making a 2nd review of the original decision.No but the burden should be on England to call for that review. So they should lose a review if its not out.
That's not the rules though. But yeah, I can see that. The only problem is that England would have seen multiple replays on the big screen at the ground, so they've still got a big leg up for making a 2nd review of the original decision.
Not that I necessarily think it's great to have the Review pictures on the big screen at the time anyway. Just leads to the arguments and time-wasting that we saw after that decision. Save the navel gazing for lunch/tea time.
Finger on there lips as well so they don't chirp at the umps.They should be made to close their eyes.
But the decision was out caught behind so Rogers has referred that decision. He hasn't reviewed the LBW decision. So once he hasn't hit it that should be it. England should also, of course, be afforded the chance to review the LBW though.That's not the rules though. But yeah, I can see that. The only problem is that England would have seen multiple replays on the big screen at the ground, so they've still got a big leg up for making a 2nd review of the original decision.
Not that I necessarily think it's great to have the Review pictures on the big screen at the time anyway. Just leads to the arguments and time-wasting that we saw after that decision. Save the navel gazing for lunch/tea time.
Na, you pay your £50 to get in, you should see what everyone at home sees. I'm glad they started showing run-outs in the ground too.That's not the rules though. But yeah, I can see that. The only problem is that England would have seen multiple replays on the big screen at the ground, so they've still got a big leg up for making a 2nd review of the original decision.
Not that I necessarily think it's great to have the Review pictures on the big screen at the time anyway. Just leads to the arguments and time-wasting that we saw after that decision. Save the navel gazing for lunch/tea time.