Yeah agreed, he plays a lot of shots really well so it's best to get as many runs as he can before his glaring weaknesses get him out.Yeah definetly the right approach this.
he's such a **** commentator.Strauss sounds so patronising here.
Haha yeah, bit of pride, but in the way you would say good shot to an 8 year old.Strauss sounds so patronising here.
Haha I'll say. The emphasis on good is so weird.Strauss sounds so patronising here.
It started the day he became cognisant of the fact that he's ginger.Why does Bairstow look like he's in a permanent state of trauma?
that point of impact is saying the predictive element doesnt matter.
I'm a bit confused. I understand why it stays with the umpire if he gives it not out. But what would have happened if the umpire had given him out and Pietersen had reviewed?It just comes up on impact because that's where it measures how far away from the stumps it is. The rules are like that because of the predictive element but it's calculated at impact so that's where it comes up on your screen.
Wasn't it missing stumps anyway so it would have been not out?I'm a bit confused. I understand why it stays with the umpire if he gives it not out. But what would have happened if the umpire had given him out and Pietersen had reviewed?
Nah, good bowling, don't want him playing a shot-a-ball, just not get totally bogged down.Bairstow seems to be stuck in the mire again.
Only teams that want to win test matches declare.So when do we declare now we are in front?
yeah but if hawkeye had said that it was hitting the stumps, would it have been out? even though the ball clearly hit outside the line, it was given as umpires call so must have been.Wasn't it missing stumps anyway so it would have been not out?