If Agar will have a 15 year wicket-loaded career, whilst this remains his best innings with the bat, we might strat ti think otherwise.Oh definitely Warne 99, not even close
Yeah come on, half the ball is cannoning straight into leg stump. The burden of proof for overturning an umpire's call is a tad too high imo.Chris Rogers must be utterly thrilled at that.
yeah this.I still really hate how you lose a review when it shows the ball hitting the stump.
Yeah. Fair enough to go with the on field decision, but agree with Nufan that you shouldn't lose a review when it shows umpires call.Yeah come on, half the ball is cannoning straight into leg stump. The burden of proof for overturning an umpire's call is a tad too high imo.
It hurts Harry, it hurts. I've just spent the last hour in the fetal position in the corner of my lounge room!!God I love Test cricket!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeah, exactly. I think it is right(ish) not to overturn 'umpire's call' decisions. But it shouldn't cost a review.I still really hate how you lose a review when it shows the ball hitting the stump.
Inclined to agree. The argument made against is that DRS is for howlers but I don't think that's what it should be; it should be to ensure that the correct decision is madeYeah. Fair enough to go with the on field decision, but agree with Nufan that you shouldn't lose a review when it shows umpires call.
Even at his best he's not a brilliant starter. One of those that punishes you big time if you don't get it right to him early on. Pattinson has the right idea, very full outside off.Cook looks more 06/07 than 10/11 atm