Cabinet96
Hall of Fame Member
Tbf, I thought Pattinson was the best bowler in the morning session.Siddle and ajdude - Patto wasn't that good
Tbf, I thought Pattinson was the best bowler in the morning session.Siddle and ajdude - Patto wasn't that good
Yes he can!CAN HE DO IT
Yeah, he needs to **** off as quickly as possible.This is the sort of situation where 50 and out could be match winning from Watson.
Doubt, yes, but that is irrelevant IMO. There's nothing in the rules about the benefit of the doubt to the batsman. Why not give the benefit of the doubt to the poor bowler for a change? Especially if the ball is a favourite to be hitting the stumps. Which it was, because the best predictive system that we have reckons it was hitting.but if its not perfect then there is doubt. A shame perhaps, but close calls = doubt its just my opinion
I meant you and me.Siddle and ajdude - Patto wasn't that good
well that goes without saying... we have to give other Victorians recognition at some point right?I meant you and me.
me too**** i thought he nicked that
late cut onto off stump for 7feel like we're on for a classic watson innings