*Official* First Test at Trent Bridge

[Pothas]

Well that is not ideal.

 

[Uppercut]

I wonder what Cook's average would be if you only counted his runs and wickets when he played an off-side drive. I'd be surprised if it was over 15.

 

[Maximas]

good for my last man standing guess, wicket early plus Cook can't get a century

 

[wellAlbidarned]

It's flat. Theres pretty low, consistent bounce. That means it's flat. Whether there's swing has **** all to do with the carry in the pitch or how flat it is, especially from the get-go.

No, whether there's movement off the pitch has everything to do with the pitch. The bounce is irrelevant though should be pretty consistent ideally.

 

[King Pietersen]

Yeah it is a shame he has to do the whole playing cricket thing still.

It could be Nick Knight though, we should not forget this.

True. Hopefully he'll become a fixture when he retires. Good point.

Cook gone! Big scalp for Australia. Pattinson looking good!

 

[ajdude]

i never understood why it would be first blood to australia. how exactly could england draw first blood in this situation? is it a 100 partnership? a half century to a batsman? a six?

 

[Spikey]

So far we've had an ad starring david warner and an ad starring ricky ponting

 

[Furball]

Yeah bit of a nothing shot that.

 

[Swingpanzee]

Cook gone! ****

 

[LongHopCassidy]

Hero.

 

[Adders]

Bah......Patto deserved that though gotta be said.

 

[Cricket Brain]

Massive breakthrough there to get Cook

 

[wellAlbidarned]

I do enjoy watching patto bowl

 

[Woodster]

Loose drive from Cookie lured into having a go at it, Pattinson deserved that bowling well here.

 

[Cabinet96]

i never understood why it would be first blood to australia. how exactly could england draw first blood in this situation? is it a 100 partnership? a half century to a batsman? a six?

Yeah, you make a good point. Also hate it when they say the bowler wins the battle after a batsman gets out for a massive score. The only way they can win the battle is with a not out really.

 

[ajdude]

man i'm missing the ej whitten legends match for this ****

 

[Daemon]

i never understood why it would be first blood to australia. how exactly could england draw first blood in this situation? is it a 100 partnership? a half century to a batsman? a six?

agreed. only acceptable way to use it would be if you said first blood to pattinson.

 

[uvelocity]

i never understood why it would be first blood to australia. how exactly could england draw first blood in this situation? is it a 100 partnership? a half century to a batsman? a six?

its the vibe

 

[NUFAN]

i never understood why it would be first blood to australia. how exactly could england draw first blood in this situation? is it a 100 partnership? a half century to a batsman? a six?

First blood for England would be lasting past the drinks break thus eliminating on the yes people in the LMS.

 

[The Battlers Prince]

Grubber on first morning ****ing good pitch, English twits