GIMH
Norwood's on Fire
Would answer a lot of questions RE Marcus NorthAre you saying batsmen have a quota of runs and once they hit that they stop scoring?
Would answer a lot of questions RE Marcus NorthAre you saying batsmen have a quota of runs and once they hit that they stop scoring?
This isn't a cricket sim. If it's a losing cause you want the batsmen to be out for nothing, not have match practice out in the middle or bother tiring your bowlers out.No it's not as clear cut as that, people aren't machines. It is simply more likely that will occur. Sometimes players can have awesome series' where they average far beyond their career average.
Unless their batsmen are out of form they shouldn't need any more practice - and hardly any of the English batsmen are out of form. I guess you would be tiring the bowlers, but at the same time you would be tiring their batsmen as well.This isn't a cricket sim. If it's a losing cause you want the batsmen to be out for nothing, not have match practice out in the middle or bother tiring your bowlers out.
Care to explain?Would answer a lot of questions RE Marcus North
Mate this is absurd - English batsmen scoring runs = bad.Unless their batsmen are out of form they shouldn't need any more practice - and hardly any of the English batsmen are out of form. I guess you would be tiring the bowlers, but at the same time you would be tiring their batsmen as well.
haha fair enough. I will try and gather some stats on it some time, and see if my gut feeling is right.Mate this is absurd - English batsmen scoring runs = bad.
I know I annoyed you with this last time, I promise it won't be brought up again until I have some decent evidence (or lack of).DeusEx's posts relating to the law of averages and his generally poor understanding of basic probability infuriate so much.
Where the **** did we get so many statisticians on this place from?DeusEx's posts relating to the law of averages and his generally poor understanding of basic probability infuriate so much.
This isn't a cricket sim. If it's a losing cause you want the batsmen to be out for nothing, not have match practice out in the middle or bother tiring your bowlers out.
Couldn't agree more. Why would you want their batsmen to find any semblance of form or confidence? Why would you be happy to see, let's say, Pietersen, belting around Johnson and co. and gaining confidence, just because it came in a losing cause? He'll make that form count later in the series when it truly matters.Mate this is absurd - English batsmen scoring runs = bad.
It's the sort of thing I find so ridiculous that I wouldn't buy into it even if you supported it with pretty good figures, as correlation doesn't prove causation. It'd be a bit like me proving that #6 Test batsmen score 42% more runs when I drink orange juice while I watch them bat - if it's true then it's a coincidence and unlikely to effect future run-scoring.I know I annoyed you with this last time, I promise it won't be brought up again until I have some decent evidence (or lack of).
That is the most likely result. Unless rain decides to play spoilsport, I really cannot see them holding out for a draw.Poor England - gonna get thrashed by around 10 wickets I reckon.
So true.Mate this is absurd - English batsmen scoring runs = bad.
Would be a pretty good statement for Hussey RE Quote of runs. (Prior to his knock today though).Would answer a lot of questions RE Marcus North
KP pretty much walked during the 2005 Ashes. Third test I think, to McGrath.Just to show we aint talking garbage, I dug up some old WI matches and uploaded the lbw in question!
YouTube - Richie Richardson walks on an LBW vs Australia, 1984 MCG Rodney Hogg
In my experience, the most stunning example of why your theory is nonsense occurred in 1982 when the great Allan Border saved his test place (really, no myth) by scoring an unbeaten half century in a valiant losing effort against Eng at the MCGhaha fair enough. I will try and gather some stats on it some time, and see if my gut feeling is right.