howardj
International Coach
Nasser says hi.I would honestly consider bowling first in the Test, especially if we get more wet weather.
Nasser says hi.I would honestly consider bowling first in the Test, especially if we get more wet weather.
So in 8 of the 10 innings Australia will be all out for about 50 (North 26) and in the other 2 it'll be all out 250 (North 130)So you think North will outscore Australia and Dougie will pwn the hapless convict batsmen?
Oh, he means the rest of the Australian batsmen. That doesn't seem so confusing now.That's the point GIMH was making...
Oh, I realised that, but I thought he was making a joke about how it implied that Marcus North would outscore all the batsmen... including himself.I think he was mocking sifter for only changing half of the post tbf.
Will be fascinating to see if Australia have the bottle to make the changes the fans seem to want to the batting order.Not too fussed either way,either you have under the pump oldtimers struggling for form under pressure or new kids expected to produce the goods right away.Win win for England really.
He's saying after the Ashes if we lose.Just no lol.
Ponting
Clarke
Katich
Watson
Haddin
Are all safe and so they should be (Paine is close though) - And batting where they are.
We'll end up like the West Indies with your line of thinking. Just playing inexperienced kids in the hope they click.
The only ones who deserve the kick are North and Hussey.
Oh sorry. Apologies.He's saying after the Ashes if we lose.
While I wouldn't have Ponting in the same boat as North and Hussey, I don't think his position should be regarded as safe yet.Just no lol.
Ponting
Clarke
Katich
Watson
Haddin
Are all safe and so they should be (Paine is close though) - And batting where they are.
We'll end up like the West Indies with your line of thinking. Just playing inexperienced kids in the hope they click.
The only ones who deserve the kick are North and Hussey.
Because?While I wouldn't have Ponting in the same boat as North and Hussey, I don't think his position should be regarded as safe yet.
Ye i still see it as an unncessary risk move ATT & it was terrible way to end Thorpe carrer. Bell defiantely had to start the Ashes ATT, given he certainly was looking the real deal in the test he had played on the back of his FC form. But KP could have waited IMO.England made the harsh call on Thorpe in 05, he was a shoe in I thought for the Ashes, excellent record against australia, yet they retained Bell and debuted KP, what a good move in hindsight. I have such a strong feeling- like a lot of Aussies- that it could be so bad for us this series, and it all couldve been avoided months and months ago. But we'll see I gues, and hope for the bloody best.
His form over the past 3 years. While he hasn't been shocking the way Hussey has, he's developed a vulnerability when he passes 50 that he simply didn't have 5 years ago. Has passed 50 as many times as Tendulkar in the last 2 years, but only has 2 centuries to his name, averaging just 42. If he has a poor series with the bat and Australia don't regain the Ashes, his position would be very hard to justify.Because?
Meh I would say luck has a lot to do with it. Keeps on finding the fielders in the last 2 years even if he is batting well.His form over the past 3 years. While he hasn't been shocking the way Hussey has, he's developed a vulnerability when he passes 50 that he simply didn't have 5 years ago. Has passed 50 as many times as Tendulkar in the last 2 years, but only has 2 centuries to his name, averaging just 42. If he has a poor series with the bat and Australia don't regain the Ashes, his position would be very hard to justify.