Easily. Angelo is an all rounder, better fielder and almost equal bowler.that is a good stat maybe I am underrating him but I still feel Angelo for Lanka is a bigger loss then Nehra for India.
awta. I don't know whether it's the media, posters, Dhoni or the Fans (don't infract me please ) but I do feel some anti India sentiment going around. Not surprised actually, I see alot of annoying Indian supporters who have no idea what they're talking about all the time. Sucks that people don't like the Indian team because of them.I'm just mildly annoyed at people doing their level best to downplay India's performance at this World Cup. Two games back a lot of people were running their mouths off about how India could only beat minnows blah, blah, blah. Now that India have a chance of going all the way, people are trying to find ways to discredit it. I'm not talking about this forum in particular, but that's the general impression I get.
As for the match tomorrow, should be a great game. 50-50.
You're only just glimpsing what we feelIn fact I can see my self hating the Indian team if I wasn't Indian
That should not be on no matter whoever it is. Game is bigger than any individual. I don't know how that is possible, if the person is having an injury and still decides to play he should be in the field as well. Isn't there some kind of a rule like this?Word has it that Muralitharan may only play as a bowler tomorrow, i.e, a substitute will take his place after he finishes his overs. Now, I have the utmost respect for Muralitharan, but the Indians should not allow that. It's the bloody World Cup final. If they want him to play then he has to bowl and field.
I am not very familiar with that particular rule, but I'm sure there's a loophole somewhere that can be exploited (remember that infamous Ricky Ponting run-out in Ashes 2005?).That should not be on no matter whoever it is. Game is bigger than any individual. I don't know how that is possible, if the person is having an injury and still decides to play he should be in the field as well. Isn't there some kind of a rule like this?
The thing about that case is that Simon Jones had gone off for a genuine injury (and a very serious one - it just about ended his international career), and more importantly he picked up during the game itself. He had intended to do his fielding duty but couldn't. So I can see the need for substitute fielders.I am not very familiar with that particular rule, but I'm sure there's a loophole somewhere that can be exploited (remember that infamous Ricky Ponting run-out in Ashes 2005?).
For those who watched the entire New Zealand-Sri Lanka semi-final - did Muralitharan leave the field as soon as he bowled his ten?
That goes against the rules, I hope the Indians do not allow this. You simply cannot go into a game with an injury and then substitute yourself when it is convenient.Word has it that Muralitharan may only play as a bowler tomorrow, i.e, a substitute will take his place after he finishes his overs. Now, I have the utmost respect for Muralitharan, but the Indians should not allow that. It's the bloody World Cup final. If they want him to play then he has to bowl and field.
So what's the latest on Gambhir? He is absolutely vital in countering Sri Lanka's famous mid-innings spin choke. His fifty played a key role in beating Australia by keeping the RRR at a reasonable rate throughout and I think a major reason why Pakistan lost is that no one was able to play that type of innings: knocking the spinners for ones and twos without taking too many risks.