Nasser asked him outright "Have you changed your mind overnight like you usually do?" but Beef hadn't. Said something along the lines of he didn't know what else to call it but cheating.This shot has been done to death though. And inevitably, if it's someone from the team the commentator supports it's "oh they didn't know it bounced, very hard to tell coming forward" etc. Yet when it's am opposing player it's "he definitely knew it bounced, how can't he know? He's a cheat etc".
It rank stuff, assuming Botham is being accurately reported here (an I dot doubt he is). If Cook says Hughes told him he wasn't sure on the field and has no problem with it, well it ill-behoves a bloke in the comm box to say otherwise.
Yes. Its like he's swinging the club at the ball, but it keeps rolling back down into the bunker.Hussain saying that Bres is "in a bit of a bunker here". Well, no, Nasser, if you'd been watching rather than exchanging matey chat with "Sir Ian", you'd have seen that he's been trying to hit it but keeps picking out the fielders
Ah, I misunderstood - I thought by "in the bunker" he meant he was keeping his head down, a la Adolf Hitler in 1945. Missed the golfing metaphor completely.Yes. Its like he's swinging the club at the ball, but it keeps rolling back down into the bunker.
Clever little analogy that...God I must be bored...
Botham and Hussain were talking about it on commentary, as Botham's remarks on air seem to have caused a bit of stir in your neck of the woods.This **** has been done to death though. And inevitably, if it's someone from the team the commentator supports it's "oh they didn't know it bounced, very hard to tell coming forward" etc. Yet when it's am opposing player it's "he definitely knew it bounced, how can't he know? He's a cheat etc".
It rank stuff, assuming Botham is being accurately reported here (an I dot doubt he is). If Cook says Hughes told him he wasn't sure on the field and has no problem with it, well it ill-behoves a bloke in the comm box to say otherwise.
As someone pointed out yesterday, that stuff isn't going to work anyway with cameras there and referrals about the place. Fmd, I suppose the line of work you're in sometimes gives an insight, bit I'd flat out rule a line through trying to discern what a bloke is thinking from a facial expression. One bloke's interpretation as a sly smirk or guilt (Hughes yesterday for the Pommy watchers, Bell for the more informed) is another bloke seeing uncertainty.
Point is, the fielder told the batsman he's unsure, and no one blew up either when Bell referred his (again, according to Cook). Everyone off the field reads more onto it than the players.