Spent ages on Sky debating it too.Nice shot there from Bell. More innocuous pap from Hilfenhaus. Honestly, just no threat at all. They replayed Strauss' dismissal yesterday. Christ it was reasonably straight and he played around it.. Just a little bit of movement, a bit like Hughes off Tremlett at the WACA.
They're on tv saying what a cracking ball it was. Well, it probably surprised Strauss as it wasn't utter ****, but really, was nothing special.
Yeah indeed. As for Beer's action - or anyone else's, can tell nowt from a still frame IMO.Spent ages on Sky debating it too.
Just played all round straight ball and got bowled for me. Nothing special just a poor shot.
You're right mate - but one to keep an eye on nonetheless.Yeah indeed. As for Beer's action - or anyone else's, can tell nowt from a still frame IMO.
It's just embarrassing. I mean, using a little bit of license, if I bowled that number of overs in a series I'd back myself that 5 batsmen might get bored and I'd jag a few wickets, and I mean I wouldn't get a bowl in a Chinese restaurant.5 wickets in 4 tests is an appalling statistic.
Given we've now found a spinner who looks reasonable, he will no doubt chuck it and cop a ban!!! Will re-work his action and become Xavier Doherty.You're right mate - but one to keep an eye on nonetheless.
Looks a different class of bowler than D'oherty, has bowled pretty well today
Bowls with a bent arm the whole time, doesn't really extend it.I hate Sky, that's not the first time they've kept me up through lunch with some crappy 90s nostalgia.
Anyhow some poor cricket from Oz since lunch. Men out in the deep = no pressure on the batsmen with the new ball
Ye gods, they're just showing Michael Beer's action in freeze frame. 15 degrees anyone?
Maybe - he looked to me to be straightening it, but I could very well be wrong and in any event I agree that it's not right to judge him on 2D tv footage alone. Out of a sense of balance I'd say that I'm not much happier about Steve Finn's action either.Bowls with a bent arm the whole time, doesn't really extend it.
Wouldn't call it a "throw", per se, I don't think it's a blight. But it'd be interesting to see if he gets over the degree limit, bowling with a slightly bent arm the whole way through.
He's been Reiffel-barrel straight this series.It's just embarrassing. I mean, using a little bit of license, if I bowled that number of overs in a series I'd back myself that 5 batsmen might get bored and I'd jag a few wickets, and I mean I wouldn't get a bowl in a Chinese restaurant.
Really? Hadn't noticed anything about Finn I must say. Worth a look I suppose.Maybe - he looked to me to be straightening it, but I could very well be wrong and in any event I agree that it's not right to judge him on 2D tv footage alone. Out of a sense of balance I'd say that I'm not much happier about Steve Finn's action either.
Don't bowl there to anyone tbf, but you're right. Short, wide outside off. It's a lefty's dream.Don't bowl there to Cook. Just don't.
Watson has been so underused this series. It unreal, looks only bowler you have who has constantly bowled to a plan and kept it tightish. Even Harris was way off in Melbourne.Don't bowl there to anyone tbf, but you're right. Short, wide outside off. It's a lefty's dream.
Watson the most disciplined with the new ball. Has bowled well today.