What's the point of the rule then? Its crazy that umpires can be so anal about a rule but when the home team is close to winning, they don't enforce it. I'm not actually 100% certain that is what is happening though, I have no idea if we are past the level on the previous days.There's no way you can go off for light here... no way. Everything about that would be so wrong on so many levels.
Law 43, please, guys.
If they go off it just shows the folly of the rule in general. Why does a team get the benefit of leniency over light in this situation, but neither team gets that leniency two days earlier when they're chasing the game?There's no way you can go off for light here... no way. Everything about that would be so wrong on so many levels.
Law 43, please, guys.
That's because the chance of a win dropped dramatically when Eng got off to a good start. They could have easily lost a few early wickets, and it would have been a different story.We've been bowling negatively for the past hour or so. Its done nothing positive for our team apart from getting some practice for the upcoming ODIs.
Well they are wasting time, if they had any class then they would do what they say they should happen by England.Hahahahahahahaha the umpires asking Australia to hurry up.
RIP irony.
Sticking by this, ftrYeah, actually, hoping England gets in a position to win it and we start wasting time just to see how Cook reacts.