And given cricket is still far more an upper-class sport than elsewhere, you'd think there'd be more further-educated (and, indeed, higher-educated) types in it than other sports.
But who will England play in the future? Could be like the 1880's, just England v Australia every yearTest Cricket is doing fine here though, what is happening worldwide is pretty irrelevant when it comes to deciding whether we would be interested inw atching or not. As I say, I imagine it would get as many viewers as a domestic OD game
Strauss with twin-failures against Northants too, worth pointing out.Welcome runs for Bell & Vaughan. Another failure for Shah this morning.
That's a pretty dire list then.Strauss with twin-failures against Northants too, worth pointing out.
Much needed runs for Ian Bell though, against a fairly decent attack to boot. Who are the main challengers to the middle order spots that Bell and Collingwood could leave free? I'd assume that Owais Shah and Ed Joyce would be at the top of the list.
And who would you suggest?That's a pretty dire list then.
And he was out the ball after I made this post.Bopara on 71* at the moment, I hope he can push on and convert it into a big century. Really can't see why people don't rate him as a batsman.
Yep, and several other northern counties too.In certain places that is true and in others it isnt. An oversimplifiaction to paint the sport as upper-class. In Yorkshire its roots are firmly and proudly working class.
They should be, but unfortunately I'd bet on Bopara being picked ahead of either.Strauss with twin-failures against Northants too, worth pointing out.
Much needed runs for Ian Bell though, against a fairly decent attack to boot. Who are the main challengers to the middle order spots that Bell and Collingwood could leave free? I'd assume that Owais Shah and Ed Joyce would be at the top of the list.
You don't class Lancs and Yorks as A-List?Yep, and several other northern counties too.
I'd bet, though, that as far as A-List counties are concerned, it'd be overwhelmingly more rooted in upper-class than working-class. There's enough of it, indeed, for people to continue to spout outdated claptrap about it being biased towards southern and upper-class types.